• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性心肌梗死患者院内心源性休克的风险分层方案

A Risk Stratification Scheme for In-Hospital Cardiogenic Shock in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction.

作者信息

Yang Jun-Qing, Ran Peng, Li Jie, Zhong Qi, Smith Sidney C, Wang Yan, Fonarow Gregg C, Qiu Jia, Morgan Louise, Wei Xue-Biao, Chen Xiao-Bo, Huang Jie-Leng, Hao Yong-Chen, Zhou Ying-Ling, Siu Chung-Wah, Zhao Dong, Chen Ji-Yan, Yu Dan-Qing

机构信息

Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease, Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.

Division of Cardiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.

出版信息

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Mar 4;9:793497. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.793497. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2022.793497
PMID:35310985
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8931535/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is the leading cause of death in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) despite advances in care. This study aims to derive and validate a risk score for in-hospital development of CS in patients with AMI.

METHODS

In this study, we used the Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China-Acute Coronary Syndrome (CCC-ACS) registry of 76,807 patients for model development and internal validation. These patients came from 158 tertiary hospitals and 82 secondary hospitals between 2014 and 2019, presenting AMI without CS upon admission. The eligible patients with AMI were randomly assigned to derivation ( = 53,790) and internal validation ( = 23,017) cohorts. Another cohort of 2,205 patients with AMI between 2014 and 2016 was used for external validation. Based on the identified predictors for in-hospital CS, a new point-based CS risk scheme, referred to as the CCC-ACS CS score, was developed and validated.

RESULTS

A total of 866 (1.1%) and 39 (1.8%) patients subsequently developed in-hospital CS in the CCC-ACS project and external validation cohort, respectively. The CCC-ACS CS score consists of seven variables, including age, acute heart failure upon admission, systolic blood pressure upon admission, heart rate, initial serum creatine kinase-MB level, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and mechanical complications. The area under the curve for in-hospital development of CS was 0.73, 0.71, and 0.85 in the derivation, internal validation and external validation cohorts, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This newly developed CCC-ACS CS score can quantify the risk of in-hospital CS for patients with AMI, which may help in clinical decision making.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02306616.

摘要

目的

尽管在治疗方面取得了进展,但心源性休克(CS)仍是急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者死亡的主要原因。本研究旨在推导并验证AMI患者院内发生CS的风险评分。

方法

在本研究中,我们使用了中国心血管疾病改善计划-急性冠状动脉综合征(CCC-ACS)登记库中的76807例患者进行模型开发和内部验证。这些患者来自2014年至2019年间的158家三级医院和82家二级医院,入院时表现为AMI且无CS。符合条件的AMI患者被随机分配到推导队列(n = 53790)和内部验证队列(n = 23017)。另一组由2014年至2016年间的2205例AMI患者组成的队列用于外部验证。基于确定的院内CS预测因素,开发并验证了一种新的基于点数的CS风险方案,称为CCC-ACS CS评分。

结果

在CCC-ACS项目队列和外部验证队列中,分别有866例(1.1%)和39例(1.8%)患者随后发生了院内CS。CCC-ACS CS评分由七个变量组成,包括年龄、入院时急性心力衰竭、入院时收缩压、心率、初始血清肌酸激酶-MB水平、估计肾小球滤过率和机械并发症。推导队列、内部验证队列和外部验证队列中院内发生CS的曲线下面积分别为0.73、0.71和0.85。

结论

新开发的CCC-ACS CS评分可以量化AMI患者院内发生CS的风险,这可能有助于临床决策。

临床试验注册

www.ClinicalTrials.gov,标识符:NCT02306616。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9da/8931535/006abf3893bb/fcvm-09-793497-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9da/8931535/c3c9165c5639/fcvm-09-793497-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9da/8931535/d3c1f2ea87be/fcvm-09-793497-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9da/8931535/006abf3893bb/fcvm-09-793497-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9da/8931535/c3c9165c5639/fcvm-09-793497-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9da/8931535/d3c1f2ea87be/fcvm-09-793497-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9da/8931535/006abf3893bb/fcvm-09-793497-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
A Risk Stratification Scheme for In-Hospital Cardiogenic Shock in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction.急性心肌梗死患者院内心源性休克的风险分层方案
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Mar 4;9:793497. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.793497. eCollection 2022.
2
A risk score to predict in-hospital mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome at early medical contact: results from the Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China-Acute Coronary Syndrome (CCC-ACS) Project.一种预测急性冠状动脉综合征患者早期就医时院内死亡率的风险评分:中国改善心血管疾病护理-急性冠状动脉综合征(CCC-ACS)项目的结果
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Jan;9(2):167. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-31.
3
Early risk stratification in patients with cardiogenic shock irrespective of the underlying cause - the Cardiogenic Shock Score.无论病因如何,对心源性休克患者进行早期风险分层——心源性休克评分。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2022 Apr;24(4):657-667. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2449. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
4
Cardiogenic Shock Among Patients with and without Acute Myocardial Infarction in a Latin American Country: A Single-Institution Study.拉美国家伴或不伴急性心肌梗死患者的心源性休克:单中心研究。
Glob Heart. 2021 Nov 30;16(1):78. doi: 10.5334/gh.988. eCollection 2021.
5
Predicting the development of in-hospital cardiogenic shock in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention: the ORBI risk score.预测行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者院内心原性休克的发生:ORBI 风险评分。
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jun 7;39(22):2090-2102. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy127.
6
The novel cystatin C, lactate, interleukin-6, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (CLIP)-based mortality risk score in cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction.新型胱抑素 C、乳酸、白细胞介素 6 和 N 末端 pro-B 型利钠肽(CLIP)在急性心肌梗死后心源性休克患者的死亡风险评分。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Jun 21;42(24):2344-2352. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab110.
7
Early ACEI/ARB use and in-hospital outcomes of acute myocardial infarction patients with systolic blood pressure <100 mmHg and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: Findings from the CCC-ACS project.收缩压<100 mmHg且接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性心肌梗死患者早期使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素Ⅱ受体阻滞剂及其院内结局:CCC-ACS项目的研究结果
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Sep 29;9:1003442. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1003442. eCollection 2022.
8
Cardiogenic Shock in Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy Versus Acute Myocardial Infarction: An 8-Year National Perspective on Clinical Characteristics, Management, and Outcomes.心尖球形综合征与急性心肌梗死所致心原性休克的临床特征、处理和预后的 8 年全国性观察研究
JACC Heart Fail. 2019 Jun;7(6):469-476. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2018.12.007. Epub 2019 May 8.
9
A Novel Risk Score to Predict In-Hospital Mortality in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: Results From a Prospective Observational Cohort.一种预测急性心肌梗死患者院内死亡率的新型风险评分:一项前瞻性观察队列研究的结果
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Apr 7;9:840485. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.840485. eCollection 2022.
10
Sex Differences in In-Hospital Management and Outcomes of Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome.急性冠状动脉综合征患者住院期间管理和结局的性别差异。
Circulation. 2019 Apr 9;139(15):1776-1785. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.037655.

引用本文的文献

1
Relationship between NT-proBNP levels and existing/ QRS fragmentation in patients with myocardial infarction.心肌梗死患者 NT-proBNP 水平与现有/ QRS 碎裂的关系。
Biomark Med. 2024;18(10-12):535-544. doi: 10.1080/17520363.2024.2345584. Epub 2024 May 24.
2
Cardiogenic Shock Among Patients with Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in a Middle Eastern Country: A Single-Center Experience.中东某国急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的心源性休克:单中心经验
J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2023 Jan 20;34(4):232-240. doi: 10.37616/2212-5043.1323. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Fifteen-Year Trends in Incidence of Cardiogenic Shock Hospitalization and In-Hospital Mortality in the United States.美国心源牲休克住院发病率和住院病死率 15 年变化趋势
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Aug 3;10(15):e021061. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.021061. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
2
Multivessel Versus Culprit-Vessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock.多血管病变与罪犯血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死合并心原性休克患者。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 May 24;14(10):1067-1078. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.02.021. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
3
Temporal trends in incidence, causes, use of mechanical circulatory support and mortality in cardiogenic shock.
心源性休克的发病率、病因、机械循环支持的使用及死亡率的时间趋势
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Apr;8(2):1295-1303. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13202. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
4
Temporal Trends and Outcomes of Mechanical Complications in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction.急性心肌梗死患者机械并发症的时间趋势和结局。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Sep 23;12(18):1825-1836. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.04.039.
5
Twenty-Year Trends in the Incidence and Outcome of Cardiogenic Shock in AMIS Plus Registry.AMIS Plus 注册研究中心 20 年来心原性休克发病率和转归的变化趋势。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Apr;12(4):e007293. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007293.
6
Update in the Management of Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients with Cardiogenic Shock.急性冠脉综合征合并心原性休克患者的管理进展。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2019 Mar 4;21(4):17. doi: 10.1007/s11886-019-1102-3.
7
Diabetes Mellitus and Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction.糖尿病合并急性心肌梗死后心原性休克。
Am J Med. 2018 Jul;131(7):778-786.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2018.03.004. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
8
Predicting the development of in-hospital cardiogenic shock in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention: the ORBI risk score.预测行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者院内心原性休克的发生:ORBI 风险评分。
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jun 7;39(22):2090-2102. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy127.
9
Management and predictors of outcome in unselected patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results from the Bremen STEMI Registry.未选择患者的心源性休克合并急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死的管理和预后预测因素:不来梅 STEMI 注册研究结果。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2018 May;107(5):371-379. doi: 10.1007/s00392-017-1192-0. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
10
Rationale and design of the Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China (CCC) project: A national effort to prompt quality enhancement for acute coronary syndrome.中国改善心血管疾病护理(CCC)项目的基本原理与设计:一项旨在促进急性冠状动脉综合征质量提升的全国性行动。
Am Heart J. 2016 Sep;179:107-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.06.005. Epub 2016 Jun 18.