• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

萘普生钠治疗膝骨关节炎患者的疗效和安全性:一项为期 13 周的前瞻性、随机、多中心研究。

Efficacy and safety of naproxcinod in the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: a 13-week prospective, randomized, multicenter study.

机构信息

Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.

出版信息

Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010 May;18(5):629-39. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2009.12.013. Epub 2010 Feb 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.joca.2009.12.013
PMID:20202489
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the cyclooxygenase-inhibiting nitric-oxide donator, naproxcinod, compared with naproxen and placebo in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee.

METHOD

918 eligible patients were randomly assigned to double-blind treatment with either naproxcinod 375 mg, naproxcinod 750 mg, naproxen 500 mg or placebo, twice daily for 13 weeks. The primary objective was to show superiority of naproxcinod compared to placebo. Main efficacy criteria were assessment of pain and physical function using the Western Ontario and MacMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and patients' overall rating of disease status (Likert scale). The main secondary objectives were to show that naproxcinod was non-inferior to naproxen 500 mg and to evaluate overall safety.

RESULTS

Both doses of naproxcinod were statistically and clinically superior to placebo in relieving signs and symptoms of OA of the knee after 13 weeks of treatment, as demonstrated by all three co-primary endpoints (P< or =0.0003). The evaluation of the other secondary efficacy measures was consistent with the primary endpoint results. Naproxcinod 750 mg was non-inferior to equimolar doses of naproxen 500 mg in the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population. 24.5% of patients discontinued prematurely, with a higher incidence in the placebo group (18.6%) than the active groups (4.3-7.1%) discontinuing due to lack of efficacy. Both doses of naproxcinod were well-tolerated, with most adverse events being mild or moderate. Compared to placebo, naproxcinod 750 mg and 375 mg showed a similar blood pressure (BP) profile in contrast to naproxen which increased BP.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrated the clinical efficacy and safety of naproxcinod in the management of the signs and symptoms of OA. Naproxcinod was well-tolerated, with BP effects similar to placebo and different from naproxen. Clinical Trials.gov identifier: NCT00542555.

摘要

目的

评估环氧化酶抑制一氧化氮供体萘普生昔定(naproxcinod)在膝骨关节炎(OA)患者中的疗效和安全性,与萘普生和安慰剂进行比较。

方法

918 名符合条件的患者被随机分配至双盲治疗,分别接受萘普生昔定 375mg、750mg、萘普生 500mg 或安慰剂,每日 2 次,治疗 13 周。主要目标是证明萘普生昔定优于安慰剂。主要疗效标准是使用西部安大略省和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)评估疼痛和身体功能,以及患者对疾病状况的整体评价(Likert 量表)。主要次要目标是证明萘普生昔定与萘普生 500mg 等效且评估整体安全性。

结果

在 13 周的治疗后,两种剂量的萘普生昔定在缓解膝骨关节炎的体征和症状方面均优于安慰剂,所有三个主要终点(P<或=0.0003)均具有统计学和临床意义。对其他次要疗效指标的评估与主要终点结果一致。萘普生昔定 750mg 在在意向治疗(ITT)人群中与等摩尔剂量的萘普生 500mg 等效。24.5%的患者提前停药,安慰剂组(18.6%)的发生率高于活性药物组(4.3-7.1%),因疗效不佳而停药。两种剂量的萘普生昔定都具有良好的耐受性,大多数不良事件为轻度或中度。与安慰剂相比,萘普生昔定 750mg 和 375mg 显示出与萘普生相似的血压(BP)谱,而萘普生则升高 BP。

结论

这些结果表明萘普生昔定在治疗 OA 体征和症状方面具有临床疗效和安全性。萘普生昔定具有良好的耐受性,BP 效应与安慰剂相似,与萘普生不同。临床试验.gov 标识符:NCT00542555。

相似文献

1
Efficacy and safety of naproxcinod in the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: a 13-week prospective, randomized, multicenter study.萘普生钠治疗膝骨关节炎患者的疗效和安全性:一项为期 13 周的前瞻性、随机、多中心研究。
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010 May;18(5):629-39. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2009.12.013. Epub 2010 Feb 16.
2
Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of the cyclooxygenase-inhibiting nitric oxide donator naproxcinod in treating osteoarthritis of the hip or knee.环氧化酶抑制性一氧化氮供体萘普生诺昔在治疗髋或膝骨关节炎中的疗效、安全性及耐受性
J Rheumatol. 2009 Jun;36(6):1290-7. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.081011. Epub 2009 May 1.
3
Effects of the cyclooxygenase inhibiting nitric oxide donator naproxcinod versus naproxen on systemic blood pressure in patients with osteoarthritis.环氧化酶抑制性一氧化氮供体萘普生辛酯与萘普生对骨关节炎患者全身血压的影响。
Am J Cardiol. 2009 Sep 15;104(6):840-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.05.014.
4
Efficacy and safety of naproxcinod in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: a 53-week prospective randomized multicenter study.萘普生钠治疗膝骨关节炎的疗效和安全性:一项 53 周前瞻性随机多中心研究。
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Feb;40(4):285-97. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2010.06.002. Epub 2010 Sep 9.
5
Efficacy, safety, and effects on blood pressure of naproxcinod 750 mg twice daily compared with placebo and naproxen 500 mg twice daily in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip: a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter study.在髋骨关节炎患者中,每日两次服用750毫克萘普生辛酯与安慰剂及每日两次服用500毫克萘普生相比的疗效、安全性及对血压的影响:一项随机、双盲、平行组、多中心研究。
Arthritis Rheum. 2010 Dec;62(12):3635-44. doi: 10.1002/art.27694.
6
Responsiveness of the OARSI-OMERACT osteoarthritis pain and function measures.OARSI-OMERACT 骨关节炎疼痛和功能测量的反应性。
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012 Jun;20(6):541-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2012.03.001. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
7
Comparison of the COX-inhibiting nitric oxide donator AZD3582 and rofecoxib in treating the signs and symptoms of Osteoarthritis of the knee.COX 抑制性一氧化氮供体 AZD3582 与罗非昔布治疗膝骨关节炎体征和症状的比较。
Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Dec 15;53(6):827-37. doi: 10.1002/art.21586.
8
A randomised, placebo controlled, comparative trial of the gastrointestinal safety and efficacy of AZD3582 versus naproxen in osteoarthritis.一项关于AZD3582与萘普生在骨关节炎中胃肠道安全性及疗效的随机、安慰剂对照比较试验。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 Mar;64(3):449-56. doi: 10.1136/ard.2004.023572. Epub 2004 Sep 2.
9
Effects of naproxcinod on blood pressure in patients with osteoarthritis.萘普生对骨关节炎患者血压的影响。
Am J Cardiol. 2011 May 1;107(9):1338-45. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.12.046. Epub 2011 Mar 2.
10
Naproxcinod: AZD 3582, HCT 3012, naproxen nitroxybutylester, nitronaproxen, NO-naproxen.萘普生辛诺德:AZD 3582、HCT 3012、萘普生硝氧丁酯、硝萘普生、NO-萘普生。
Drugs R D. 2007;8(4):255-8. doi: 10.2165/00126839-200708040-00006.

引用本文的文献

1
Does sex affect the efficacy of systemic pharmacological treatments of pain in knee osteoarthritis? A systematic review.性别是否会影响膝关节骨关节炎疼痛的全身药物治疗效果?一项系统评价。
Osteoarthr Cartil Open. 2024 Feb 10;6(1):100438. doi: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2024.100438. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
The Triple Crown: NO, CO, and HS in cancer cell biology.三重冠:癌症细胞生物学中的 NO、CO 和 HS。
Pharmacol Ther. 2023 Sep;249:108502. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2023.108502. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
3
Blood flow restriction with different load levels in patients with knee osteoarthritis: protocol of a randomized controlled trial.
血流限制联合不同负荷水平治疗膝骨关节炎患者:一项随机对照试验方案。
Trials. 2022 Jan 15;23(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-05998-3.
4
Identifying predictors of response to oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and paracetamol in osteoarthritis: a hypothesis-driven protocol for an OA Trial Bank individual participant data meta-analysis.识别骨关节炎患者对口服非甾体抗炎药和扑热息痛反应的预测因素:OA 试验银行个体参与者数据荟萃分析的假设驱动方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 11;11(8):e048652. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048652.
5
Carbon Monoxide and Nitric Oxide as Examples of the Youngest Class of Transmitters.一氧化碳和一氧化氮作为新一代递质的范例。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Jun 2;22(11):6029. doi: 10.3390/ijms22116029.
6
An international, multicentre, double-blind, randomized study (DISSCO): effect of diacerein vs celecoxib on symptoms in knee osteoarthritis.一项国际、多中心、双盲、随机研究(DISSCO):双醋瑞因与塞来昔布对膝骨关节炎症状的影响。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2020 Dec 1;59(12):3858-3868. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa072.
7
The dichotomous role of HS in cancer cell biology? Déjà vu all over again.HS 在癌细胞生物学中的双重角色?似曾相识。
Biochem Pharmacol. 2018 Mar;149:205-223. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2018.01.042. Epub 2018 Feb 14.
8
Naproxcinod shows significant advantages over naproxen in the mdx model of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.在杜兴氏肌营养不良症的mdx模型中,萘普生辛酯相较于萘普生显示出显著优势。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2015 Aug 22;10:101. doi: 10.1186/s13023-015-0311-0.
9
Combined chondroitin sulfate and glucosamine for painful knee osteoarthritis: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial versus celecoxib.硫酸软骨素与氨基葡萄糖联合治疗膝关节疼痛性骨关节炎:一项与塞来昔布对比的多中心、随机、双盲、非劣效性试验
Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Jan;75(1):37-44. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-206792. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
10
The efficacy of duloxetine, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and opioids in osteoarthritis: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.度洛西汀、非甾体抗炎药和阿片类药物治疗骨关节炎的疗效:一项系统文献综述和荟萃分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Mar 11;15:76. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-76.