Department of Pathology, L235, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
J Mol Diagn. 2010 May;12(3):320-7. doi: 10.2353/jmoldx.2010.090123. Epub 2010 Mar 4.
The distinction between mycosis fungoides (MF) and inflammatory dermatoses (ID) by clinicopathologic criteria can be challenging. There is limited information regarding the performance characteristics and utility of TCRG and TCRB clonality assays in diagnosis of MF and ID from paraffin-embedded tissue sections. In this study, PCR tests were performed with both TCRG and TCRB BIOMED-2 clonality methods followed by capillary electrophoresis and Genescan analysis using DNA samples from 35 MF and 96 ID patients with 69 and 133 paraffin-embedded specimens, respectively. Performance characteristics were determined for each test individually and in combination. TCRG and TCRB tests demonstrated identical sensitivity (64%) and specificity (84%) when analyzed as individual assays. The positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and change of posttest MF probability over a range of MF pretest probabilities were obtained. These data were used to construct an algorithm for sequential use of TCRG and TCRB. As single tests, commercially available BIOMED-2 PCR-based TCRG and TCRB clonality tests on paraffin-embedded tissue have no significant difference in terms of sensitivity and specificity. Combined use of the two tests in patients with intermediate pretest probabilities as proposed in the algorithm could improve test utility.
根据临床病理标准,蕈样肉芽肿(MF)和炎症性皮肤病(ID)之间的区别具有一定挑战性。有关 TCRG 和 TCRB 克隆性检测在石蜡包埋组织切片中诊断 MF 和 ID 的性能特征和实用性的信息有限。在这项研究中,使用两种 TCRG 和 TCRB BIOMED-2 克隆性方法进行 PCR 检测,然后使用毛细管电泳和 Genescan 分析,分别使用 35 例 MF 和 96 例 ID 患者的 DNA 样本(分别有 69 和 133 个石蜡包埋标本)。分别确定了每种检测方法的性能特征及其组合的性能特征。当作为单独的检测方法进行分析时,TCRG 和 TCRB 检测的灵敏度(64%)和特异性(84%)相同。获得了一系列 MF 检测前概率下的阳性预测值、阴性预测值和 MF 检测后概率的变化。这些数据用于构建 TCRG 和 TCRB 的顺序使用算法。作为单独的检测方法,商业上可获得的基于 BIOMED-2 的 TCRG 和 TCRB 克隆性检测在灵敏度和特异性方面没有显著差异。如算法中所建议,在中等检测前概率的患者中联合使用这两种检测方法可能会提高检测的实用性。