Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA.
J Neurosci. 2010 Mar 3;30(9):3467-72. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4130-09.2010.
Strong error-related activity in medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) has been shown repeatedly with neuroimaging and event-related potential studies for the last several decades. Multiple theories have been proposed to account for error effects, including comparator models and conflict detection models, but the neural mechanisms that generate error signals remain in dispute. Typical studies use relatively low error rates, confounding the expectedness and the desirability of an error. Here we show with a gambling task and functional magnetic resonance imaging that when losses are more frequent than wins, the mPFC error effect disappears, and moreover, exhibits the opposite pattern by responding more strongly to unexpected wins than losses. These findings provide perspective on recent ERP studies and suggest that mPFC error effects result from a comparison between actual and expected outcomes.
几十年来,神经影像学和事件相关电位研究反复表明,内侧前额叶皮层(mPFC)中存在强烈的与错误相关的活动。已经提出了多种理论来解释错误效应,包括比较器模型和冲突检测模型,但产生错误信号的神经机制仍存在争议。典型的研究使用相对较低的错误率,混淆了错误的预期性和可欲性。在这里,我们通过一项赌博任务和功能磁共振成像显示,当损失比赢时更频繁时,mPFC 的错误效应消失了,而且,出乎意料的赢比输会引起更强的反应,表现出相反的模式。这些发现为最近的 ERP 研究提供了视角,并表明 mPFC 的错误效应是由实际结果和预期结果之间的比较产生的。