Suppr超能文献

医生推荐结直肠癌筛查的方法:一项定性研究。

Physicians' approaches to recommending colorectal cancer screening: a qualitative study.

作者信息

Walsh Judith M E, Karliner Leah, Burke Nancy, Somkin Carol P, Pham Linda A, Pasick Rena

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, 1635 Divisadero Street, Suite 600, San Francisco, CA 94115-1793, USA.

出版信息

J Cancer Educ. 2010 Sep;25(3):385-90. doi: 10.1007/s13187-010-0058-1. Epub 2010 Mar 5.

Abstract

Little is known about strategies that physicians use to encourage receipt of colorectal cancer screening (CRCS). This study conducted focus groups with physicians. Twenty-seven physicians participated in four focus groups. Physicians described four categories of approaches: (1) why screening is important, (2) providing test information, (3) motivational strategies, and (4) tailoring strategies. Participants reported tailoring based on their relationship with a patient, as well as to patient gender, education, and language. Tailoring to cultural background or ethnicity was not prominent. Most physicians reported a typical approach to CRCS and reported some tailoring based on gender, education, and language, but not on ethnicity.

摘要

关于医生用于鼓励患者接受结直肠癌筛查(CRCS)的策略,我们所知甚少。本研究对医生进行了焦点小组访谈。27名医生参与了4个焦点小组。医生们描述了四类方法:(1)筛查为何重要,(2)提供检测信息,(3)激励策略,以及(4)个性化策略。参与者报告称,会根据与患者的关系以及患者的性别、教育程度和语言进行个性化调整。根据文化背景或种族进行的个性化调整并不突出。大多数医生报告了一种CRCS的典型方法,并报告了一些基于性别、教育程度和语言的个性化调整,但不是基于种族。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.结直肠癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组建议声明
Ann Intern Med. 2008 Nov 4;149(9):627-37. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-9-200811040-00243. Epub 2008 Oct 6.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验