• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Making it work: health care provider perspectives on strategies to increase colorectal cancer screening in federally qualified health centers.使其发挥作用:医疗服务提供者对在联邦合格医疗中心增加结直肠癌筛查策略的看法。
J Cancer Educ. 2013 Dec;28(4):777-83. doi: 10.1007/s13187-013-0531-8.
2
Patients' perceptions of colorectal cancer screening tests and preparatory education in federally qualified health centers.患者对联邦合格健康中心的结直肠癌筛查测试及预备教育的看法。
J Cancer Educ. 2015 Jun;30(2):294-300. doi: 10.1007/s13187-014-0733-8.
3
Health care providers' perspectives of an intervention designed to improve colorectal cancer screening rates in family medicine residency clinics : a qualitative study.医疗服务提供者对旨在提高家庭医学住院医师诊所结直肠癌筛查率的一项干预措施的看法:一项定性研究
J Cancer Educ. 2012 Dec;27(4):695-702. doi: 10.1007/s13187-012-0393-5.
4
Primary Care Provider Beliefs and Recommendations About Colorectal Cancer Screening in Four Healthcare Systems.四个医疗体系中初级保健提供者对结直肠癌筛查的信念和建议。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2020 Nov;13(11):947-958. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-20-0109. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
5
Barriers of and facilitators to physician recommendation of colorectal cancer screening.医生推荐结直肠癌筛查的障碍与促进因素
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Dec;22(12):1681-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0396-9. Epub 2007 Oct 16.
6
Colorectal cancer screening practices in Alabama: a survey of primary care physicians.阿拉巴马州的结直肠癌筛查实践:一项对初级保健医生的调查
J Cancer Educ. 2012 Dec;27(4):687-94. doi: 10.1007/s13187-012-0392-6.
7
Barriers to and facilitators of implementing colorectal cancer screening evidence-based interventions in federally qualified health centers: a qualitative study.在联邦合格健康中心实施结直肠癌筛查循证干预的障碍和促进因素:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jul 10;24(1):797. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11163-0.
8
An Analysis of Lung Cancer Screening Beliefs and Practice Patterns for Community Providers Compared to Academic Providers.社区医疗服务提供者与学术医疗服务提供者的肺癌筛查观念及实践模式分析
Cancer Control. 2018 Jan-Dec;25(1):1073274818806900. doi: 10.1177/1073274818806900.
9
Health Care Provider Characteristics Associated With Colorectal Cancer Screening Preferences and Use.与结直肠癌筛查偏好和使用相关的医疗服务提供者特征。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2022 Jan;97(1):101-109. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2021.06.028. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
10
Knowledge, experiences, and barriers to colorectal cancer screening: a survey of health care providers working in primary care settings.结直肠癌筛查的知识、经验及障碍:对在基层医疗环境中工作的医疗服务提供者的一项调查
J Cancer Educ. 2015 Mar;30(1):53-61. doi: 10.1007/s13187-014-0676-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Protocol paper for an implementation science approach to promoting colorectal cancer screening in Federally Qualified Health Center clinics: A stepped-wedge, multilevel intervention trial.关于在联邦合格医疗中心诊所推广结直肠癌筛查的实施科学方法的方案文件:一项阶梯式楔形多级干预试验。
Res Sq. 2024 Jul 18:rs.3.rs-4558718. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4558718/v1.
2
Strategic use of resources to enhance colorectal cancer screening for patients with diabetes (SURE: CRC4D) in federally qualified health centers: a protocol for hybrid type ii effectiveness-implementation trial.资源的战略性利用以增强联邦合格健康中心中糖尿病患者的结直肠癌筛查(SURE:CRC4D):一项混合 II 型有效性实施试验的方案。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Jul 5;25(1):242. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02496-0.
3
Assessing the effectiveness of a community health advisor plus screen to save educational intervention on stool-based testing adherence in an African American safety net clinic population: study protocol for a randomized pragmatic trial.评估社区卫生顾问加筛查对非裔美国人医疗服务提供系统人群基于粪便的检测依从性的教育干预效果:一项随机实用试验研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Feb 15;23(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06076-4.
4
Development of a Group-Based Community Health Worker Intervention to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Latinos.基于群体的社区卫生工作者干预措施的制定,以增加拉丁裔人群的结直肠癌筛查率。
Hisp Health Care Int. 2021 Mar;19(1):47-54. doi: 10.1177/1540415320923564. Epub 2020 May 29.
5
'Simple and easy:' providers' and latinos' perceptions of the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) for colorectal cancer screening.简单易懂:提供者和拉丁裔对粪便免疫化学测试(FIT)用于结直肠癌筛查的看法。
Ethn Health. 2020 Feb;25(2):206-221. doi: 10.1080/13557858.2017.1418298. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
6
A randomized controlled trial of a multicomponent, targeted, low-literacy educational intervention compared with a nontargeted intervention to boost colorectal cancer screening with fecal immunochemical testing in community clinics.一项多成分、针对性、低文化水平教育干预与非针对性干预的随机对照试验,以促进社区诊所采用粪便免疫化学检测进行结直肠癌筛查。
Cancer. 2017 Apr 15;123(8):1390-1400. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30481. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
7
Patients' perceptions of colorectal cancer screening tests and preparatory education in federally qualified health centers.患者对联邦合格健康中心的结直肠癌筛查测试及预备教育的看法。
J Cancer Educ. 2015 Jun;30(2):294-300. doi: 10.1007/s13187-014-0733-8.
8
Effective recruitment strategies and community-based participatory research: community networks program centers' recruitment in cancer prevention studies.有效的招募策略与基于社区的参与性研究:社区网络项目中心在癌症预防研究中的招募工作
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 Mar;23(3):416-23. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0760.

本文引用的文献

1
Patterns of colorectal cancer test use, including CT colonography, in the 2010 National Health Interview Survey.2010 年全国健康访谈调查中的结直肠癌检测使用情况,包括 CT 结肠成像。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012 Jun;21(6):895-904. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-0192. Epub 2012 Apr 6.
2
Colonoscopy versus fecal immunochemical testing in colorectal-cancer screening.结肠镜检查与粪便免疫化学试验在结直肠癌筛查中的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Feb 23;366(8):697-706. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1108895.
3
Perceptions of colorectal cancer among three ethnic subgroups of US blacks: a qualitative study.美国黑人三个少数民族群体对结直肠癌的认知:一项定性研究。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2011 Aug;103(8):669-80. doi: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)30406-5.
4
Optimizing colorectal cancer screening by getting FIT right.通过正确进行粪便免疫化学检测优化结直肠癌筛查。
Gastroenterology. 2011 Nov;141(5):1551-5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.09.021. Epub 2011 Sep 22.
5
Trends in colorectal cancer test use among vulnerable populations in the United States.美国脆弱人群中结直肠癌检测使用的趋势。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 Aug;20(8):1611-21. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0220. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
6
Physicians' colorectal cancer screening discussion and recommendation patterns.医生的结直肠癌筛查讨论和推荐模式。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 Mar;20(3):509-21. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0749. Epub 2011 Jan 14.
7
Colorectal cancer screening: patients' and physicians' perspectives on decision-making factors.结直肠癌筛查:患者和医生对决策因素的看法
J Cancer Educ. 2011 Jun;26(2):285-93. doi: 10.1007/s13187-010-0145-3.
8
Colorectal cancer screening comparing no screening, immunochemical and guaiac fecal occult blood tests: a cost-effectiveness analysis.比较不筛查、免疫化学和愈创木脂粪便潜血试验的结直肠癌筛查:成本效益分析。
Int J Cancer. 2011 Apr 15;128(8):1908-17. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25530.
9
Physicians' approaches to recommending colorectal cancer screening: a qualitative study.医生推荐结直肠癌筛查的方法:一项定性研究。
J Cancer Educ. 2010 Sep;25(3):385-90. doi: 10.1007/s13187-010-0058-1. Epub 2010 Mar 5.
10
Creating community-academic partnerships for cancer disparities research and health promotion.建立社区与学术机构的合作关系,以开展癌症差异研究和健康促进工作。
Health Promot Pract. 2011 May;12(3):456-62. doi: 10.1177/1524839909341035. Epub 2009 Oct 12.

使其发挥作用:医疗服务提供者对在联邦合格医疗中心增加结直肠癌筛查策略的看法。

Making it work: health care provider perspectives on strategies to increase colorectal cancer screening in federally qualified health centers.

作者信息

Gwede Clement K, Davis Stacy N, Quinn Gwendolyn P, Koskan Alexis M, Ealey Jamila, Abdulla Rania, Vadaparampil Susan T, Elliott Gloria, Lopez Diana, Shibata David, Roetzheim Richard G, Meade Cathy D

机构信息

Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA,

出版信息

J Cancer Educ. 2013 Dec;28(4):777-83. doi: 10.1007/s13187-013-0531-8.

DOI:10.1007/s13187-013-0531-8
PMID:23943277
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3864594/
Abstract

Colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) rates are low among men and women who seek health care at federally qualified health centers (FQHCs). This study explores health care providers' perspectives about their patient's motivators and impediments to CRCS and receptivity to preparatory education. A mixed methods design consisting of in-depth interviews, focus groups, and a short survey is used in this study. The participants of this study are 17 health care providers practicing in FQHCs in the Tampa Bay area. Test-specific patient impediments and motivations were identified including fear of abnormal findings, importance of offering less invasive fecal occult blood tests, and need for patient-centered test-specific educational materials in clinics. Opportunities to improve provider practices were identified including providers' reliance on patients' report of symptoms as a cue to recommend CRCS and overemphasis of clinic-based guaiac stool tests. This study adds to the literature on CRCS test-specific motivators and impediments. Providers offered unique approaches for motivating patients to follow through with recommended CRCS and were receptive to in-clinic patient education. Findings readily inform the design of educational materials and interventions to increase CRCS in FQHCs.

摘要

在联邦合格医疗中心(FQHC)寻求医疗服务的男性和女性中,结直肠癌筛查(CRCS)率较低。本研究探讨了医疗服务提供者对其患者进行CRCS的动机、障碍以及对预备教育的接受程度的看法。本研究采用了一种混合方法设计,包括深入访谈、焦点小组和简短调查。本研究的参与者是在坦帕湾地区FQHC执业的17名医疗服务提供者。确定了特定检测的患者障碍和动机,包括对异常结果的恐惧、提供侵入性较小的粪便潜血检测的重要性以及诊所中对以患者为中心的特定检测教育材料的需求。确定了改善医疗服务提供者做法的机会,包括医疗服务提供者依赖患者的症状报告作为推荐CRCS的线索以及对基于诊所的愈创木脂粪便检测的过度强调。本研究为关于CRCS特定检测动机和障碍的文献增添了内容。医疗服务提供者提供了激励患者完成推荐的CRCS的独特方法,并接受诊所内的患者教育。研究结果为设计教育材料和干预措施以提高FQHC中的CRCS提供了依据。