Utrecht University, Clinical and Health Psychology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Psychol Health. 2011 Jan;26(1):23-39. doi: 10.1080/08870440903207627.
This article examines the extent to which self-reported emotional eating is a predictor of unhealthy snack consumption or, alternatively, an expression of beliefs about the relation between emotions and eating derived from concerns about eating behaviour. Three studies were conducted. Study 1 (N = 151) and Study 2 (N = 184) investigated the predictive validity of emotional eating compared to habit strength in snack consumption, employing 7-day snack diaries. Both studies demonstrated that snack consumption was not predicted by emotional eating but depended on the habit of unhealthy snacking and on restraint eating. As emotional eating was not a significant predictor of snack intake, Study 3 addressed the alternative hypothesis of emotional eating being an expression of concerns about eating behaviour. Results from this cross-sectional survey (N = 134) showed that emotional eating was significantly associated with several concerns. Together, these studies show that snack intake is better predicted by habit strength and restraint eating than by emotional eating. Additionally, the results suggest that in normal-weight women the concept of emotional eating may not capture the tendency to eat under emotional conditions, but rather reflects beliefs about the relation between emotions and eating.
本文探讨了自我报告的情绪性进食在多大程度上可以预测不健康的零食消费,或者相反,它是否表达了对情绪与进食之间关系的信念,这种信念源于对进食行为的担忧。进行了三项研究。研究 1(N = 151)和研究 2(N = 184)调查了与习惯强度相比,情绪性进食在零食消费方面的预测效度,采用了 7 天零食日记。这两项研究都表明,零食消费不是由情绪性进食预测的,而是取决于不健康零食的习惯和节食行为。由于情绪性进食不是零食摄入的显著预测因素,因此研究 3 探讨了情绪性进食是对进食行为担忧的表达的替代假设。这项横断面调查的结果(N = 134)表明,情绪性进食与多种担忧显著相关。综上所述,这些研究表明,习惯强度和节食行为比情绪性进食更能预测零食摄入量。此外,研究结果表明,在正常体重的女性中,情绪性进食的概念可能无法捕捉到在情绪状态下进食的倾向,而是反映了对情绪与进食之间关系的信念。