Health Behaviour Research Group, Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour (PRCHB), University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010 Mar 6;8:25. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-25.
Adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors require psychometrically rigorous measures to assess their psychosocial well-being. Without methodologically adequate scales the accuracy of information obtained on the prevalence of needs, predictors of risk, and the potential success of any interventions, can be questioned. This review assessed the psychometric properties of measures designed specifically to identify the psychosocial health of this unique population.
Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL and EMBASE databases were searched to identify measures developed to assess the psychosocial health of AYA cancer survivors. Searches were limited to the years 1998-2008. A search of Medline revealed that the number of publications related to the assessment of psychosocial well-being in AYA cancer survivors prior to this period were minimal. The psychometric properties of identified measures were evaluated against pre-determined and generally accepted psychometric criteria including: reliability (internal consistency and test-retest); validity (face, content, construct, and criterion); responsiveness; acceptability; and feasibility.
Seven quality of life measures met the inclusion criteria. No measures of unmet need were identified. All seven measures reported adequate internal consistency, face, content, and construct validity. Test-retest reliability, criterion (predictive) validity, responsiveness, acceptability, and feasibility were rarely examined.
There is a need to further evaluate the psychometric properties of existing quality of life measures for AYA cancer survivors. Valid, reliable, and acceptable measures which can assess the psychosocial needs of this population should also be developed.
青少年和年轻成人(AYA)癌症幸存者需要经过严格心理计量学测试的评估工具来评估他们的社会心理健康状况。如果没有方法学上适当的量表,就会对所获得的需求普遍性、风险预测因子,以及任何干预措施的潜在成功产生质疑。本综述评估了专门用于确定这一独特人群社会心理健康状况的测量工具的心理计量学特性。
为了确定旨在评估 AYA 癌症幸存者社会心理健康的测量工具,我们检索了 Medline、PsycINFO、CINAHL 和 EMBASE 数据库。检索范围限定在 1998 年至 2008 年。对 Medline 的检索显示,在这一时期之前,与 AYA 癌症幸存者社会心理健康评估相关的出版物数量很少。根据预先确定的和普遍接受的心理计量学标准,评估了所确定的测量工具的心理计量学特性,包括:信度(内部一致性和重测信度);效度(表面效度、内容效度、结构效度和效标效度);反应度;可接受性;和可行性。
有 7 项生活质量测量工具符合纳入标准。未发现未满足的需求测量工具。所有 7 项测量工具均报告了足够的内部一致性、表面效度、内容效度和结构效度。重测信度、效标(预测)效度、反应度、可接受性和可行性很少被检验。
需要进一步评估现有的 AYA 癌症幸存者生活质量测量工具的心理计量学特性。还应该开发出有效的、可靠的、可接受的,并且能够评估这一人群社会心理需求的测量工具。