Suppr超能文献

缝线大小和类型对贯穿腱修复骨切出的影响。

Effect of suture size and type on bone cutout in transosseous tendon repairs.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA.

出版信息

Arthroscopy. 2010 Mar;26(3):324-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.08.020. Epub 2010 Jan 25.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We compared bone cutout of polyester and polyblend suture in 2 suture sizes with static and cyclic loading in a Sawbone model (Pacific Research Laboratories, Vashon, WA).

METHODS

Polyester and polyblend sutures in both No. 2 and No. 5 sizes were placed through transosseous tunnels in closed-cell polyurethane foam and tied over the bar of an electromechanical load frame at a fixed height. Seven sutures in each group were pulled at a rate of 1 mm/s until bone cutout occurred. Another set of 28 sutures were cyclically loaded at increasing loads until failure.

RESULTS

With static and cyclic loads, No. 5 polyester suture (Ethibond; Ethicon, Somerville, NJ) and No. 5 polyblend suture (FiberWire; Arthrex, Naples, FL) had a higher cutout load than the No. 2 sutures (P < .001). No. 2 polyblend suture had a higher static failure load than No. 2 polyester suture (P = .02). With cyclic loading, No. 2 polyblend suture had a higher load to cutout than No. 2 polyester suture (P = .01), and No. 5 polyblend suture had a higher load to cutout than No. 5 polyester suture (P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

No. 2 sutures showed bone cutout at lower forces under static and cyclic loading as compared with No. 5 sutures in this Sawbone model, and no decrease in performance with regard to bone cutout was noted with polyblend as compared with polyester.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

No. 5 polyester or polyblend suture may be preferable to No. 2 suture to avoid bone cutout in tendon-to-bone repair, and No. 5 polyblend may be preferable to No. 5 polyester to avoid bone cutout.

摘要

目的

我们比较了聚酯和聚混合缝线在两种缝线尺寸下的骨切割情况,在Sawbone 模型(华盛顿州 Vashon 的 Pacific Research Laboratories)中进行了静态和循环加载。

方法

将 2 号和 5 号尺寸的聚酯和聚混合缝线穿过闭孔泡沫中的贯穿骨隧道,在机电加载框架的杆上系紧,固定高度。每组 7 根缝线以 1mm/s 的速度拉伸,直到发生骨切割。另一组 28 根缝线在增加的载荷下循环加载,直到失效。

结果

在静态和循环加载下,5 号聚酯缝线(Ethibond;Ethicon,Somerville,NJ)和 5 号聚混合缝线(FiberWire;Arthrex,Naples,FL)的切割负荷均高于 2 号缝线(P<.001)。2 号聚混合缝线的静态失效负荷高于 2 号聚酯缝线(P=.02)。在循环加载下,2 号聚混合缝线的切割负荷高于 2 号聚酯缝线(P=.01),5 号聚混合缝线的切割负荷高于 5 号聚酯缝线(P=.003)。

结论

在这个 Sawbone 模型中,与 5 号缝线相比,2 号缝线在静态和循环加载下的骨切割力较低,与聚酯缝线相比,聚混合缝线的骨切割性能没有下降。

临床相关性

在肌腱-骨修复中,为避免骨切割,5 号聚酯或聚混合缝线可能优于 2 号缝线,5 号聚混合缝线可能优于 5 号聚酯缝线以避免骨切割。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验