Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA.
Arthroscopy. 2010 Mar;26(3):324-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.08.020. Epub 2010 Jan 25.
We compared bone cutout of polyester and polyblend suture in 2 suture sizes with static and cyclic loading in a Sawbone model (Pacific Research Laboratories, Vashon, WA).
Polyester and polyblend sutures in both No. 2 and No. 5 sizes were placed through transosseous tunnels in closed-cell polyurethane foam and tied over the bar of an electromechanical load frame at a fixed height. Seven sutures in each group were pulled at a rate of 1 mm/s until bone cutout occurred. Another set of 28 sutures were cyclically loaded at increasing loads until failure.
With static and cyclic loads, No. 5 polyester suture (Ethibond; Ethicon, Somerville, NJ) and No. 5 polyblend suture (FiberWire; Arthrex, Naples, FL) had a higher cutout load than the No. 2 sutures (P < .001). No. 2 polyblend suture had a higher static failure load than No. 2 polyester suture (P = .02). With cyclic loading, No. 2 polyblend suture had a higher load to cutout than No. 2 polyester suture (P = .01), and No. 5 polyblend suture had a higher load to cutout than No. 5 polyester suture (P = .003).
No. 2 sutures showed bone cutout at lower forces under static and cyclic loading as compared with No. 5 sutures in this Sawbone model, and no decrease in performance with regard to bone cutout was noted with polyblend as compared with polyester.
No. 5 polyester or polyblend suture may be preferable to No. 2 suture to avoid bone cutout in tendon-to-bone repair, and No. 5 polyblend may be preferable to No. 5 polyester to avoid bone cutout.
我们比较了聚酯和聚混合缝线在两种缝线尺寸下的骨切割情况,在Sawbone 模型(华盛顿州 Vashon 的 Pacific Research Laboratories)中进行了静态和循环加载。
将 2 号和 5 号尺寸的聚酯和聚混合缝线穿过闭孔泡沫中的贯穿骨隧道,在机电加载框架的杆上系紧,固定高度。每组 7 根缝线以 1mm/s 的速度拉伸,直到发生骨切割。另一组 28 根缝线在增加的载荷下循环加载,直到失效。
在静态和循环加载下,5 号聚酯缝线(Ethibond;Ethicon,Somerville,NJ)和 5 号聚混合缝线(FiberWire;Arthrex,Naples,FL)的切割负荷均高于 2 号缝线(P<.001)。2 号聚混合缝线的静态失效负荷高于 2 号聚酯缝线(P=.02)。在循环加载下,2 号聚混合缝线的切割负荷高于 2 号聚酯缝线(P=.01),5 号聚混合缝线的切割负荷高于 5 号聚酯缝线(P=.003)。
在这个 Sawbone 模型中,与 5 号缝线相比,2 号缝线在静态和循环加载下的骨切割力较低,与聚酯缝线相比,聚混合缝线的骨切割性能没有下降。
在肌腱-骨修复中,为避免骨切割,5 号聚酯或聚混合缝线可能优于 2 号缝线,5 号聚混合缝线可能优于 5 号聚酯缝线以避免骨切割。