Suppr超能文献

多准则决策分析在卫生干预措施中的优先排序:利用初次经验。

Multi-criteria decision analysis to prioritize health interventions: Capitalizing on first experiences.

机构信息

Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, 6500HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Health Policy. 2010 Aug;96(3):262-4. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.01.009. Epub 2010 Mar 4.

Abstract

This paper capitalizes on a first set of experiences on the application of multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) in seven low- and middle-income settings. It thereby reacts to a recent paper by Peacock et al., highlighting the potential of MCDA to guide policy makers in highly specific decision-making contexts. We argue that MCDA also has a broader application in setting priorities in health, i.e. to indicate general perceptions on priorities without defining the allocation of resources in a precise fashion. This use of MCDA can have far-reaching and constructive influences on policy formulation.

摘要

本文利用了在七个中低收入国家/地区应用多准则决策分析 (MCDA) 的第一组经验。这是对 Peacock 等人最近一篇论文的回应,该论文强调了 MCDA 在高度具体的决策背景下为政策制定者提供指导的潜力。我们认为,MCDA 在确定卫生保健重点方面也具有更广泛的应用,即指明对重点的普遍看法,而不是以精确的方式定义资源分配。这种 MCDA 的使用可以对政策制定产生深远而建设性的影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验