Programs for Assessment of Technology in Health (PATH) Research Institute, St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2014 Feb;14(1):81-99. doi: 10.1586/14737167.2014.859525. Epub 2013 Dec 13.
In recent years, the quest for more comprehensiveness, structure and transparency in reimbursement decision-making in healthcare has prompted the research into alternative decision-making frameworks. In this environment, multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) is arising as a valuable tool to support healthcare decision-making. In this paper, we present the main MCDA decision support methods (elementary methods, value-based measurement models, goal programming models and outranking models) using a case study approach. For each family of methods, an example of how an MCDA model would operate in a real decision-making context is presented from a critical perspective, highlighting the parameters setting, the selection of the appropriate evaluation model as well as the role of sensitivity and robustness analyses. This study aims to provide a step-by-step guide on how to use MCDA methods for reimbursement decision-making in healthcare.
近年来,在医疗保健领域,人们一直在寻求更全面、更具结构性和更透明的报销决策制定方法,这促使人们研究替代决策框架。在此背景下,多准则决策分析(MCDA)作为一种支持医疗保健决策制定的有价值的工具而出现。本文通过案例研究的方法介绍了主要的 MCDA 决策支持方法(基本方法、基于价值的测量模型、目标规划模型和超越模型)。对于每种方法,从批判性的角度展示了如何在实际决策背景下操作 MCDA 模型的示例,突出了参数设置、选择适当的评估模型以及敏感性和稳健性分析的作用。本研究旨在为如何在医疗保健报销决策中使用 MCDA 方法提供一步一步的指南。