Hyde K M, Maier H R, Colby C B
Centre for Applied Modelling in Water Engineering, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia, 5000, Australia.
J Environ Manage. 2005 Dec;77(4):278-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.06.011. Epub 2005 Nov 8.
The choice among alternative water supply sources is generally based on the fundamental objective of maximising the ratio of benefits to costs. There is, however, a need to consider sustainability, the environment and social implications in regional water resources planning, in addition to economics. In order to achieve this, multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) techniques can be used. Various sources of uncertainty exist in the application of MCDA methods, including the selection of the MCDA method, elicitation of criteria weights and assignment of criteria performance values. The focus of this paper is on the uncertainty in the criteria weights. Sensitivity analysis can be used to analyse the effects of uncertainties associated with the criteria weights. Two existing sensitivity methods are described in this paper and a new distance-based approach is proposed which overcomes limitations of these methods. The benefits of the proposed approach are the concurrent alteration of the criteria weights, the applicability of the method to a range of MCDA techniques and the identification of the most critical criteria weights. The existing and proposed methods are applied to three case studies and the results indicate that simultaneous consideration of the uncertainty in the criteria weights should be an integral part of the decision making process.
在可供选择的供水水源之间进行抉择,通常基于使效益成本比最大化这一基本目标。然而,除了经济因素外,在区域水资源规划中还需要考虑可持续性、环境及社会影响。为实现这一点,可以采用多准则决策分析(MCDA)技术。在MCDA方法的应用中存在各种不确定性来源,包括MCDA方法的选择、准则权重的确定以及准则性能值的赋值。本文的重点是准则权重的不确定性。敏感性分析可用于分析与准则权重相关的不确定性的影响。本文描述了两种现有的敏感性方法,并提出了一种新的基于距离的方法,该方法克服了这些方法的局限性。所提方法的优点包括准则权重的同时改变、该方法对一系列MCDA技术的适用性以及最关键准则权重的识别。将现有方法和所提方法应用于三个案例研究,结果表明,在决策过程中应将对准则权重不确定性的同时考虑作为一个组成部分。