• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种用于事故重建中不确定性分析的非概率方法。

Two non-probabilistic methods for uncertainty analysis in accident reconstruction.

机构信息

School of Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, PR China.

出版信息

Forensic Sci Int. 2010 May 20;198(1-3):134-7. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.02.006. Epub 2010 Mar 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.02.006
PMID:20207512
Abstract

There are many uncertain factors in traffic accidents, it is necessary to study the influence of these uncertain factors to improve the accuracy and confidence of accident reconstruction results. It is difficult to evaluate the uncertainty of calculation results if the expression of the reconstruction model is implicit and/or the distributions of the independent variables are unknown. Based on interval mathematics, convex models and design of experiment, two non-probabilistic methods were proposed. These two methods are efficient under conditions where existing uncertainty analysis methods can hardly work because the accident reconstruction model is implicit and/or the distributions of independent variables are unknown; and parameter sensitivity can be obtained from them too. An accident case is investigated by the methods proposed in the paper. Results show that the convex models method is the most conservative method, and the solution of interval analysis method is very close to the other methods. These two methods are a beneficial supplement to the existing uncertainty analysis methods.

摘要

交通事故存在许多不确定因素,有必要研究这些不确定因素的影响,以提高事故重建结果的准确性和置信度。如果重建模型的表达式是隐式的,或者独立变量的分布是未知的,那么很难评估计算结果的不确定性。基于区间数学、凸模型和实验设计,提出了两种非概率方法。在现有的不确定性分析方法难以应用的情况下,这两种方法非常有效,因为事故重建模型是隐式的,或者独立变量的分布是未知的;并且可以从中获得参数敏感性。本文提出的方法对一个事故案例进行了研究。结果表明,凸模型方法是最保守的方法,区间分析方法的解与其他方法非常接近。这两种方法是对现有不确定性分析方法的有益补充。

相似文献

1
Two non-probabilistic methods for uncertainty analysis in accident reconstruction.两种用于事故重建中不确定性分析的非概率方法。
Forensic Sci Int. 2010 May 20;198(1-3):134-7. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.02.006. Epub 2010 Mar 6.
2
Uncertainty of calculation results in vehicle collision analysis.
Forensic Sci Int. 2007 Apr 11;167(2-3):181-8. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.06.061. Epub 2006 Aug 1.
3
A combined Monte Carlo and possibilistic approach to uncertainty propagation in event tree analysis.一种用于事件树分析中不确定性传播的蒙特卡罗和可能性相结合的方法。
Risk Anal. 2008 Oct;28(5):1309-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01085.x. Epub 2008 Jul 9.
4
A probabilistic arsenic exposure assessment for children who contact chromated copper arsenate (CCA)-treated playsets and decks, Part 2: Sensitivity and uncertainty analyses.接触铬酸铜砷酸盐(CCA)处理过的儿童游乐设施和平台的儿童的概率性砷暴露评估,第2部分:敏感性和不确定性分析。
Risk Anal. 2006 Apr;26(2):533-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00748.x.
5
[The characteristics of computer simulation of traffic accidents].[交通事故的计算机模拟特征]
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2008 Dec;24(6):401-6.
6
EUD-based radiotherapy treatment plan evaluation: incorporating physical and Monte Carlo statistical dose uncertainties.基于等效均匀剂量的放射治疗计划评估:纳入物理和蒙特卡罗统计剂量不确定性。
Phys Med Biol. 2005 Sep 7;50(17):4097-109. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/50/17/013. Epub 2005 Aug 24.
7
Monte Carlo probabilistic sensitivity analysis for patient level simulation models: efficient estimation of mean and variance using ANOVA.用于患者水平模拟模型的蒙特卡洛概率敏感性分析:使用方差分析有效估计均值和方差
Health Econ. 2007 Oct;16(10):1009-23. doi: 10.1002/hec.1199.
8
A comparison of numerical solutions of partial differential equations with probabilistic and possibilistic parameters for the quantification of uncertainty in subsurface solute transport.用于量化地下溶质运移不确定性的具有概率和可能性参数的偏微分方程数值解的比较。
J Contam Hydrol. 2009 Nov 3;110(1-2):45-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2009.08.005. Epub 2009 Sep 11.
9
Joint propagation of variability and imprecision in assessing the risk of groundwater contamination.评估地下水污染风险时变异性与不精确性的联合传播
J Contam Hydrol. 2007 Aug 15;93(1-4):72-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2007.01.015. Epub 2007 Jan 27.
10
Probabilistic model evaluation of continuous air monitor response for meeting radiation protection goals.用于满足辐射防护目标的连续空气监测器响应的概率模型评估
Health Phys. 2009 Sep;97(3):228-41. doi: 10.1097/HP.0b013e3181abaaa7.

引用本文的文献

1
A case-oriented approach for analyzing the uncertainty of a reconstructed result based on the evidence theory.基于证据理论的面向案例的重建结果不确定性分析方法。
Int J Legal Med. 2019 Jul;133(4):1089-1106. doi: 10.1007/s00414-018-1885-6. Epub 2018 Jul 5.