• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于证据理论的面向案例的重建结果不确定性分析方法。

A case-oriented approach for analyzing the uncertainty of a reconstructed result based on the evidence theory.

机构信息

School of Automobile and Mechanical Engineering, Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha, 410004, China.

Key Laboratory of Safety Design and Reliability Technology for Engineering Vehicle, Changsha, 410004, Hunan Province, China.

出版信息

Int J Legal Med. 2019 Jul;133(4):1089-1106. doi: 10.1007/s00414-018-1885-6. Epub 2018 Jul 5.

DOI:10.1007/s00414-018-1885-6
PMID:29978385
Abstract

Uncertainty analysis is an effective methodology to improve the reliability of an accident reconstruction result. Many existing methods can be employed in this field, which can confuse a practicing engineer who does not know these methods well. To make the selection easier, a case-oriented approach was proposed based on the evidence theory. Users only need to input uncertain traces and a selected accident reconstruction model to calculate the uncertainty of reconstructed results using the proposed approach. Three basic steps of the case-oriented approach are as follows: first, all types of input traces should be transformed into their evidence form; then, focal elements of the reconstructed result and their corresponding basic probability assignment (BPA) need to be calculated; finally, the belief function (Bel) and plausibility function (Pl) of the reconstructed results are calculated. Three common conditions, which are accidents with all interval traces, accidents with all probabilistic traces, and accidents with interval and probabilistic traces, were discussed based on the basic steps of the case-oriented approach. Furthermore, methods for how to transform different traces to their evidence form, how to calculate the interval of the response efficiently, and how to fuse high conflict evidence were presented. Numerical cases showed that the approach worked well in all conditions. Finally, a vehicle collisions accident case was presented to demonstrate the application of the proposed approach in practice.

摘要

不确定性分析是提高事故重建结果可靠性的有效方法。许多现有的方法可用于该领域,这可能会使不太熟悉这些方法的实践工程师感到困惑。为了便于选择,提出了一种基于证据理论的面向案例的方法。用户只需输入不确定的痕迹和选择的事故重建模型,即可使用所提出的方法计算重建结果的不确定性。面向案例的方法的三个基本步骤如下:首先,将所有类型的输入痕迹转换为其证据形式;然后,计算重建结果的焦点元素及其相应的基本概率分配 (BPA);最后,计算重建结果的置信函数 (Bel) 和似然函数 (Pl)。基于面向案例的方法的基本步骤,讨论了三种常见情况,即所有区间痕迹的事故、所有概率痕迹的事故以及区间和概率痕迹的事故。此外,还提出了如何将不同的痕迹转换为其证据形式、如何有效地计算响应的区间以及如何融合高冲突证据的方法。数值案例表明,该方法在所有情况下均有效。最后,提出了一个车辆碰撞事故案例,以演示所提出的方法在实际中的应用。

相似文献

1
A case-oriented approach for analyzing the uncertainty of a reconstructed result based on the evidence theory.基于证据理论的面向案例的重建结果不确定性分析方法。
Int J Legal Med. 2019 Jul;133(4):1089-1106. doi: 10.1007/s00414-018-1885-6. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
2
Methods for analyzing the uncertainty of a reconstructed result in a traffic accident with interval and probabilistic traces.利用区间和概率痕迹分析交通事故重建结果不确定性的方法
Forensic Sci Int. 2017 Jan;270:200-210. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.10.007. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
3
Two non-probabilistic methods for uncertainty analysis in accident reconstruction.两种用于事故重建中不确定性分析的非概率方法。
Forensic Sci Int. 2010 May 20;198(1-3):134-7. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.02.006. Epub 2010 Mar 6.
4
A simple algorithm for analyzing uncertainty of accident reconstruction results.一种用于分析事故重建结果不确定性的简单算法。
Forensic Sci Int. 2015 Dec;257:229-235. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.08.025. Epub 2015 Sep 8.
5
A Taylor-Affine Arithmetic for analyzing the calculation result uncertainty in accident reconstruction.一种用于分析事故重建中计算结果不确定性的泰勒仿射算法。
Forensic Sci Int. 2016 Sep;266:502-510. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.07.011. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
6
Methods for fusing uncertain results obtained from different models in accident reconstruction.事故重建中融合不同模型所得不确定结果的方法。
Forensic Sci Res. 2020 Jan 27;7(2):272-278. doi: 10.1080/20961790.2019.1704474. eCollection 2022.
7
Calculation reliability in vehicle accident reconstruction.车辆事故重建中的计算可靠性。
Forensic Sci Int. 2016 Jun;263:27-38. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.03.038. Epub 2016 Mar 26.
8
[Clues in pedestrian-vehicle collisions and their significance for reconstruction of accidents].[行人与车辆碰撞中的线索及其对事故重建的意义]
Z Rechtsmed. 1983;91(1):21-32. doi: 10.1007/BF01882445.
9
[The characteristics of computer simulation of traffic accidents].[交通事故的计算机模拟特征]
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2008 Dec;24(6):401-6.
10
A new approach for uncertainty analysis of ETW Rider Head Injury Reconstruction via Coupling Response Surface and Monte Carlo methodologies.通过响应面耦合和蒙特卡罗方法对 ETW 骑手头部损伤重建的不确定性分析的新方法。
Forensic Sci Int. 2020 Apr;309:110195. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110195. Epub 2020 Feb 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Car speed estimation based on cross-ratio using video data of car-mounted camera (black box).基于交比并利用车载摄像头(黑匣子)视频数据的车速估计
Forensic Sci Int. 2016 Dec;269:89-96. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.11.014. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
2
Methods for analyzing the uncertainty of a reconstructed result in a traffic accident with interval and probabilistic traces.利用区间和概率痕迹分析交通事故重建结果不确定性的方法
Forensic Sci Int. 2017 Jan;270:200-210. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.10.007. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
3
A Taylor-Affine Arithmetic for analyzing the calculation result uncertainty in accident reconstruction.
一种用于分析事故重建中计算结果不确定性的泰勒仿射算法。
Forensic Sci Int. 2016 Sep;266:502-510. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.07.011. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
4
Two Simple Formulas for Evaluating the Lower Bound of the Impact Velocity in Vehicle-pedestrian Accidents.评估车辆-行人事故中碰撞速度下限的两个简单公式。
J Forensic Sci. 2016 Jul;61(4):959-65. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.13029. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
5
Calculation reliability in vehicle accident reconstruction.车辆事故重建中的计算可靠性。
Forensic Sci Int. 2016 Jun;263:27-38. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.03.038. Epub 2016 Mar 26.
6
How accurate is accident data in road safety research? An application of vehicle black box data regarding pedestrian-to-taxi accidents in Korea.道路安全研究中的事故数据有多准确?韩国车辆黑匣子数据在行人与出租车事故中的应用。
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Nov;84:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.08.001. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
7
Prediction of skull fracture risk for children 0-9 months old through validated parametric finite element model and cadaver test reconstruction.通过经验证的参数化有限元模型和尸体试验重建预测0至9个月大儿童的颅骨骨折风险。
Int J Legal Med. 2015 Sep;129(5):1055-66. doi: 10.1007/s00414-015-1190-6. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
8
Application of cross-ratio in traffic accident reconstruction.交叉比在交通事故重建中的应用。
Forensic Sci Int. 2014 Feb;235:19-23. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.11.012. Epub 2013 Dec 16.
9
Structural reliability of road accidents reconstruction.道路交通事故重建的结构可靠性。
Forensic Sci Int. 2013 May 10;228(1-3):83-93. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.02.026. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
10
Response surface methodology and improved interval analysis method--for analyzing uncertainty in accident reconstruction.响应面法和改进区间分析方法——用于分析事故重建中的不确定性。
Forensic Sci Int. 2012 Oct 10;222(1-3):306-12. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.07.007. Epub 2012 Jul 28.