• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卧床时的最大呼气流量?三种体位的比较。

Peak expiratory flow in bed? A comparison of 3 positions.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Methodist University Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.

出版信息

Respir Care. 2013 Mar;58(3):494-7. doi: 10.4187/respcare.01843.

DOI:10.4187/respcare.01843
PMID:22906434
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines for the correct peak expiratory flow (PEF) maneuver include standing. In the hospital setting, PEF values are often ordered to assess response to asthma therapy for exacerbations. We have observed that the PEF is sometimes performed with the patient in bed.

METHODS

Healthy adults performed the PEF maneuver in random order, standing, lying back at an ~45° angle on pillows, and sitting, slumped forward ~10° with legs extended. PEF was recorded for 3 attempts in each of the 3 positions.

RESULTS

We enrolled 94 subjects (39 male, 55 female, mean age 24 y) in 2011. Mean PEF in the standing position (669 ± 42 L/min) was significantly higher than in the lying back (621 ± 42 L/min) (P < .001) and sitting (615 ± 42 L/min) positions in males (P < .001), and, similarly, in females, standing produced a significantly higher mean PEF (462 ± 42 L/min) than the lying back (422 ± 42 L/min) (P < .001) and sitting (447 ± 42 L/min) positions (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians should ensure that PEF is obtained with patients out of bed and in the standing position.

摘要

背景

目前正确的呼气峰流速(PEF)操作的指南包括站立位。在医院环境中,PEF 值通常用于评估哮喘急性发作时的治疗反应。我们发现有时患者在床上也会进行 PEF 检测。

方法

健康成年人以随机顺序分别采取站立位、仰卧位(头高脚低约 45°)和前倾位(坐直,上身前倾约 10°,双腿伸展)进行 PEF 检测,每种体位重复 3 次。

结果

2011 年我们共纳入了 94 名受试者(男性 39 名,女性 55 名,平均年龄 24 岁)。男性中,站立位时的平均 PEF(669±42L/min)显著高于仰卧位(621±42L/min)(P<.001)和前倾位(615±42L/min)(P<.001),女性中也呈现同样的趋势,站立位的平均 PEF(462±42L/min)显著高于仰卧位(422±42L/min)(P<.001)和前倾位(447±42L/min)(P<.05)。

结论

临床医生应确保患者在离床并处于站立位时进行 PEF 检测。

相似文献

1
Peak expiratory flow in bed? A comparison of 3 positions.卧床时的最大呼气流量?三种体位的比较。
Respir Care. 2013 Mar;58(3):494-7. doi: 10.4187/respcare.01843.
2
An evaluation of peak expiratory flow monitoring: a comparison of sitting versus standing measurements.呼气峰流速监测评估:坐姿与站立位测量值的比较。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2010 Mar-Apr;23(2):166-70. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2010.02.090120.
3
Evaluation of factors affecting peak expiratory flow in healthy adults: is it necessary to stand up?健康成年人中影响呼气峰值流量的因素评估:有必要站立吗?
J Asthma. 2005 Nov;42(9):793-4. doi: 10.1080/02770900500308528.
4
Effects of dorsal and lateral decubitus on peak expiratory flow in healthy subjects.仰卧位和侧卧位对健康受试者呼气峰流速的影响。
Braz J Phys Ther. 2013 Sep-Oct;17(5):435-41. doi: 10.1590/S1413-35552012005000116. Epub 2013 Oct 21.
5
[A study on peak expiratory flow monitoring maneuver as compared to forced expiratory flow maneuver].[与用力呼气流量动作相比的呼气峰值流量监测动作的研究]
Arerugi. 1996 Jan;45(1):34-40.
6
Peak expiratory flow in the standing and sitting positions is equivalent in adults: a cross-over study.成人直立位和坐位时的呼气峰流速相当:一项交叉研究。
Fam Pract. 2020 Oct 19;37(5):637-640. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmaa048.
7
Incorrect use of peak flow meters: are you observing your patients?峰值流量计的错误使用:你在观察你的患者吗?
J Asthma. 2014 Aug;51(6):566-72. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2014.914218. Epub 2014 May 9.
8
Effect of gestational age and position on peak expiratory flow rate: a longitudinal study.胎龄和体位对呼气峰值流速的影响:一项纵向研究。
Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Feb;105(2):372-6. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000152303.80103.69.
9
Effect of body position on maximal expiratory pressure and flow in adults with cystic fibrosis.体位对成年囊性纤维化患者最大呼气压和气流的影响。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2005 Nov;40(5):385-91. doi: 10.1002/ppul.20287.
10
Variability of peak expiratory flow rate in allergic rhinitis and mild asthma: relationship to maximal airway narrowing.变应性鼻炎和轻度哮喘患者呼气峰值流速的变异性:与最大气道狭窄的关系
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1998 Feb;80(2):151-8. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62948-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Lower peak expiratory flow rate is associated with a higher risk of pneumonia in patients with stroke.较低的呼气峰值流速与中风患者发生肺炎的较高风险相关。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2024 Dec;60(6):929-937. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08475-2. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
2
Does peak expiratory flow measured sitting differ from that measured standing? A cross-over study in primary care in Barbados.坐着测量的呼气峰值流速与站着测量的呼气峰值流速有差异吗?巴巴多斯初级保健领域的一项交叉研究。
BJGP Open. 2018 Jun 27;2(2):bjgpopen18X101592. doi: 10.3399/bjgpopen18X101592. eCollection 2018 Jul.
3
The effect of body position on pulmonary function: a systematic review.
体位对肺功能的影响:一项系统综述
BMC Pulm Med. 2018 Oct 11;18(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12890-018-0723-4.
4
Effect of Recumbent Body Positions on Dynamic Lung Function Parameters in Healthy Young Subjects.卧位姿势对健康年轻受试者动态肺功能参数的影响。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 May;11(5):CC08-CC10. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/25202.9828. Epub 2017 May 1.