Heaney Christopher D, Wilson Sacoby M, Wilson Omega R
University of North Carolina School of Public Health, USA.
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2007 Winter;1(4):339-49. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2007.0037.
Principal investigators (PIs) of community-based projects are predominantly university faculty who partner with community-based organizations (CBOs) to find a place to conduct research in communities that will cooperate with their research objectives. University-managed research models (UMRMs) are not always beneficial for CBOs because the university usually manages the study, collects and owns the data, and leverages control at each stage of research, without priority to resolution of problems impacting the quality of life of participating communities.
We present the principles of community-owned and -managed research (COMR), as a new community-driven research model developed by the West End Revitalization Association (WERA), a CBO in Mebane, North Carolina.
We describe WERA's development of COMR, compare the power hierarchies of COMR with traditional UMRMs, distinguish COMR partnerships from UMRM partnerships, discuss disbursement of funds, and control/ownership of data. As the PI of research activities, WERA drafted Memoranda of Agreement (MOAs) for all partners, including academic researchers, implemented quality assurance and control procedures, submitted community research protocols for institutional review, and retained data ownership for action, activism, and problem solving. COMR methods encouraged corrective action of environmental justice (EJ) problems in affected communities, including provision of public, regulated drinking water and sewer services.
COMR promotes CBOs with demonstrated organizational capacity to PI and project manager. The COMR model goes beyond UMRMs and CBPR because it emphasized the credibility and capacity of CBOs to develop, own, manage, foster, and sustain viable research agendas to address ongoing environmental hazards and related threats to health and quality of life.
社区项目的主要研究者(PIs)主要是大学教师,他们与社区组织(CBOs)合作,在社区中寻找一个能配合其研究目标开展研究的场所。大学管理的研究模式(UMRMs)对社区组织并不总是有益,因为大学通常管理研究、收集和拥有数据,并在研究的每个阶段施加控制,而不优先解决影响参与社区生活质量的问题。
我们介绍社区自主管理研究(COMR)的原则,这是北卡罗来纳州梅班的一个社区组织——西区振兴协会(WERA)开发的一种新的社区驱动研究模式。
我们描述了WERA对COMR的开发,将COMR的权力层级与传统的UMRMs进行比较,区分COMR伙伴关系与UMRMs伙伴关系,讨论资金分配以及数据的控制/所有权。作为研究活动的主要研究者,WERA为包括学术研究人员在内的所有合作伙伴起草了协议备忘录(MOAs),实施了质量保证和控制程序,提交社区研究方案以供机构审查,并保留数据所有权用于行动、维权和解决问题。COMR方法鼓励对受影响社区的环境正义(EJ)问题采取纠正行动,包括提供公共的、受监管的饮用水和下水道服务。
COMR提升了具有已证明组织能力的社区组织成为主要研究者和项目经理。COMR模式超越了UMRMs和社区参与式行动研究(CBPR),因为它强调了社区组织制定、拥有、管理、促进和维持可行研究议程以应对持续的环境危害以及对健康和生活质量的相关威胁的可信度和能力。