Suppr超能文献

对美国环境保护局外部研究招标中社区参与情况的系统评价:对研究资助者的启示

A Systematic Review of Community Engagement in the US Environmental Protection Agency's Extramural Research Solicitations: Implications for Research Funders.

作者信息

Yuen Tina, Park Alice N, Seifer Sarena D, Payne-Sturges Devon

机构信息

At the time of the study, Tina Yuen was with the National Center for Environmental Research, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Alice N. Park and Sarena D. Seifer were with Community-Campus Partnerships for Health, Seattle, WA. Devon Payne-Sturges is with the Maryland Institute for Applied Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2015 Dec;105(12):e44-52. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302811. Epub 2015 Oct 15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We systematically reviewed the Environmental Protection Agency, National Center for Environmental Research's (NCER's) requests for applications (RFAs) and identified strategies that NCER and other funders can take to bolster community engagement.

METHODS

We queried NCER's publically available online archive of funding opportunities from fiscal years 1997 to 2013. From an initial list of 211 RFAs that met our inclusion criteria, 33 discussed or incorporated elements of community engagement. We examined these RFAs along 6 dimensions and the degree of alignments between them.

RESULTS

We found changes over time in the number of RFAs that included community engagement, variations in how community engagement is defined and expected, inconsistencies between application requirements and peer review criteria, and the inclusion of mechanisms supporting community engagement in research.

CONCLUSIONS

The results inform a systematic approach to developing RFAs that support community engagement in research.

摘要

目标

我们系统地回顾了美国环境保护局国家环境研究中心(NCER)的申请要求(RFAs),并确定了NCER和其他资助者可以采取的加强社区参与的策略。

方法

我们查询了NCER从1997财年到2013财年公开的在线资助机会档案。在最初符合我们纳入标准的211份RFA列表中,有33份讨论或纳入了社区参与要素。我们从6个维度对这些RFA进行了审查,并考察了它们之间的契合程度。

结果

我们发现,包含社区参与的RFA数量随时间变化,社区参与的定义和期望存在差异,申请要求与同行评审标准之间存在不一致,以及在研究中纳入了支持社区参与的机制。

结论

研究结果为制定支持社区参与研究的RFA提供了一种系统方法。

相似文献

6
Interventions to reduce corruption in the health sector.减少卫生部门腐败现象的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 16;2016(8):CD008856. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008856.pub2.
7
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice.审核与反馈:对专业实践的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 25;3(3):CD000259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub4.
8
Prognostic factors for return to work in breast cancer survivors.乳腺癌幸存者恢复工作的预后因素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 May 7;5(5):CD015124. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015124.pub2.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
Community engagement in research: frameworks for education and peer review.社区参与研究:教育和同行评审框架。
Am J Public Health. 2010 Aug;100(8):1380-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.178137. Epub 2010 Jun 17.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验