• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估边际政策变化及处于边际状态个体的治疗平均效果。

Evaluating Marginal Policy Changes and the Average Effect of Treatment for Individuals at the Margin.

作者信息

Carneiro Pedro, Heckman James J, Vytlacil Edward

机构信息

Department of Economics University College London IFS CeMMAP Gower Street London WC1E 6BT United Kingdom

出版信息

Econometrica. 2010 Jan 1;78(1):377-394. doi: 10.3982/ECTA7089.

DOI:10.3982/ECTA7089
PMID:20209119
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2830665/
Abstract

This paper develops methods for evaluating marginal policy changes. We characterize how the effects of marginal policy changes depend on the direction of the policy change, and show that marginal policy effects are fundamentally easier to identify and to estimate than conventional treatment parameters. We develop the connection between marginal policy effects and the average effect of treatment for persons on the margin of indifference between participation in treatment and nonparticipation, and use this connection to analyze both parameters. We apply our analysis to estimate the effect of marginal changes in tuition on the return to going to college.

摘要

本文开发了评估边际政策变化的方法。我们描述了边际政策变化的效果如何取决于政策变化的方向,并表明边际政策效果从根本上来说比传统的治疗参数更容易识别和估计。我们建立了边际政策效果与处于参与治疗和不参与治疗无差异边缘的人的治疗平均效果之间的联系,并利用这种联系来分析这两个参数。我们应用我们的分析来估计学费的边际变化对上大学回报的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1285/2830665/108537e4fce5/nihms-117807-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1285/2830665/108537e4fce5/nihms-117807-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1285/2830665/108537e4fce5/nihms-117807-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating Marginal Policy Changes and the Average Effect of Treatment for Individuals at the Margin.评估边际政策变化及处于边际状态个体的治疗平均效果。
Econometrica. 2010 Jan 1;78(1):377-394. doi: 10.3982/ECTA7089.
2
Estimating Marginal Returns to Education.估算教育的边际回报。
Am Econ Rev. 2011 Oct;101(6):2754-2781. doi: 10.1257/aer.101.6.2754.
3
Heterogeneous Treatment Effects in the Presence of Self-Selection: A Propensity Score Perspective.存在自我选择时的异质性治疗效果:倾向得分视角
Sociol Methodol. 2020 Aug;50(1):350-385. doi: 10.1177/0081175019862593. Epub 2019 Aug 2.
4
Why marginal CO emissions are not decreasing for US electricity: Estimates and implications for climate policy.为什么美国电力的边际 CO 排放没有减少:估计和对气候政策的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Feb 22;119(8). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2116632119.
5
Marginal Treatment Effects from a Propensity Score Perspective.倾向得分视角下的边际治疗效果
J Polit Econ. 2019 Dec;127(6):3070-3084. doi: 10.1086/702172.
6
Lifetime earnings patterns, the distribution of future Social Security benefits, and the impact of pension reform.终身收入模式、未来社会保障福利的分配以及养老金改革的影响。
Soc Secur Bull. 2000;63(4):74-98.
7
Marginal Emissions Factors for Electricity Generation in the Midcontinent ISO.美国中大陆 ISO 地区发电的边际排放因子。
Environ Sci Technol. 2017 Dec 19;51(24):14445-14452. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b03047. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
8
"It's professional but it's personal": Participation, personal connection, and sustained disagreement in drug policy reform.“这关乎专业,但也涉及个人”:药物政策改革中的参与、个人关联与持续分歧
Int J Drug Policy. 2022 Dec;110:103903. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103903. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
9
Difference-in-differences for categorical outcomes.二分类结局的双重差分法。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Jun;57(3):681-692. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13948. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
10
The average and distributional effects of teenage adversity on long-term health.青少年时期逆境对长期健康的平均影响和分布效应。
J Health Econ. 2020 May;71:102288. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2020.102288. Epub 2020 Feb 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Estimating the heterogeneous health and well-being returns to social participation.估计社会参与对健康和幸福感的异质回报。
Health Econ. 2023 Sep;32(9):1921-1940. doi: 10.1002/hec.4695. Epub 2023 May 5.
2
Heterogeneous Treatment Effects in the Presence of Self-Selection: A Propensity Score Perspective.存在自我选择时的异质性治疗效果:倾向得分视角
Sociol Methodol. 2020 Aug;50(1):350-385. doi: 10.1177/0081175019862593. Epub 2019 Aug 2.
3
Marginal Treatment Effects from a Propensity Score Perspective.倾向得分视角下的边际治疗效果

本文引用的文献

1
Local instrumental variables and latent variable models for identifying and bounding treatment effects.用于识别和界定治疗效果的局部工具变量和潜在变量模型。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Apr 13;96(8):4730-4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.8.4730.
J Polit Econ. 2019 Dec;127(6):3070-3084. doi: 10.1086/702172.
4
Returns to Education: The Causal Effects of Education on Earnings, Health, and Smoking.回归教育:教育对收入、健康和吸烟的因果效应。
J Polit Econ. 2018 Oct;126(Suppl 1):S197-S246. doi: 10.1086/698760.
5
Understanding Causal Distributional and Subgroup Effects With the Instrumental Propensity Score.理解工具倾向评分法的因果分布效应和亚组效应。
Am J Epidemiol. 2018 Mar 1;187(3):614-622. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx282.
6
Dynamic Treatment Effects.动态治疗效果
J Econom. 2016 Feb 1;191(2):276-292. doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.12.001.
7
Estimating Marginal Returns to Education.估算教育的边际回报。
Am Econ Rev. 2011 Oct;101(6):2754-2781. doi: 10.1257/aer.101.6.2754.
8
TREATMENT EFFECTS: A BAYESIAN PERSPECTIVE.治疗效果:贝叶斯视角
Econom Rev. 2014 Jan 1;33(1-4). doi: 10.1080/07474938.2013.807103.
9
Building Bridges Between Structural and Program Evaluation Approaches to Evaluating Policy.搭建结构评估与项目评估方法之间的桥梁以评估政策。
J Econ Lit. 2010 Jun 1;48(2):356-398. doi: 10.1257/jel.48.2.356.
10
Comparing IV With Structural Models: What Simple IV Can and Cannot Identify.比较工具变量法与结构模型:简单工具变量法能够识别和无法识别的内容。
J Econom. 2010 May 1;156(1):27-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2009.09.006.