搭建结构评估与项目评估方法之间的桥梁以评估政策。
Building Bridges Between Structural and Program Evaluation Approaches to Evaluating Policy.
作者信息
Heckman James J
机构信息
University of Chicago, University College Dublin, Cowles Foundation, Yale University, and the American Bar Foundation.
出版信息
J Econ Lit. 2010 Jun 1;48(2):356-398. doi: 10.1257/jel.48.2.356.
Abstract
This paper compares the structural approach to economic policy analysis with the program evaluation approach. It offers a third way to do policy analysis that combines the best features of both approaches. We illustrate the value of this alternative approach by making the implicit economics of LATE explicit, thereby extending the interpretability and range of policy questions that LATE can answer.
摘要
本文将经济政策分析的结构方法与项目评估方法进行了比较。它提供了一种进行政策分析的第三种方法，该方法结合了两种方法的最佳特性。我们通过明确LATE的隐含经济学原理来阐述这种替代方法的价值，从而扩展了LATE能够回答的政策问题的可解释性和范围。
相似文献
1
Building Bridges Between Structural and Program Evaluation Approaches to Evaluating Policy.搭建结构评估与项目评估方法之间的桥梁以评估政策。
J Econ Lit. 2010 Jun 1;48(2):356-398. doi: 10.1257/jel.48.2.356.
2
Perspectives on health economics. 3. Economics in action.健康经济学视角。3. 经济的实际应用。
Fam Pract. 1985 Mar;2(1):4-9. doi: 10.1093/fampra/2.1.4.
3
Population planning: a well co-ordinated approach required.人口规划：需要一种协调良好的方法。
Asian Pac Popul Programme News. 1984;13(1):17-9.
4
Building bridges between health economics research and public policy evaluation.在卫生经济学研究和公共政策评估之间架起桥梁。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2010 Dec;10(6):637-40. doi: 10.1586/erp.10.79.
5
Comparing Clean Water Act Section 316(b) policy options.比较《清洁水法》第316(b)条的政策选项。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2002 May 2;2 Suppl 1:106-38. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2002.176.
6
The economics of the wellbeing economy: Understanding heterodox economics for health-in-all-policies and co-benefits.福利经济的经济学：理解健康全政策和共同效益的非正统经济学。
Health Promot J Austr. 2023 Jul;34(3):651-659. doi: 10.1002/hpja.764. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
7
Strengthening cost-effectiveness analysis in Thailand through the establishment of the health intervention and technology assessment program.通过建立卫生干预和技术评估计划加强泰国的成本效益分析。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2009;27(11):931-45. doi: 10.2165/11314710-000000000-00000.
8
Embedding an economist in regional and rural health services to add value and reduce waste by improving local-level decision-making: protocol for the 'embedded Economist' program and evaluation.将一名经济学家融入地区和农村卫生服务机构，通过改善地方层面的决策来增加价值并减少浪费：“嵌入式经济学家”项目及评估方案
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Mar 6;21(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06181-1.
9
Women as decision and policy makers. Asia.女性作为决策者和政策制定者。亚洲。
JOICFP News. 1995 Sep(254):3.
10
Conflicts between explicit and implicit population distribution policies in Asian development plans.亚洲发展计划中明确与隐含的人口分布政策之间的冲突。
Popul Geogr. 1981 Jun-Dec;3(1-2):41-56.
引用本文的文献
1
Ambient lighting, use of outdoor spaces and perceptions of public safety: evidence from a survey experiment.环境照明、户外空间的使用与公共安全认知：一项调查实验的证据
Secur J. 2022;35(3):694-724. doi: 10.1057/s41284-021-00296-0. Epub 2021 Apr 11.
2
Assessing the properties of patient-specific treatment effect estimates from causal forest algorithms under essential heterogeneity.评估因果森林算法在本质异质性下对特定于患者的治疗效果估计的特性。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Mar 13;24(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02187-5.
3
Causal interpretations of family GWAS in the presence of heterogeneous effects.存在异质性效应时家族全基因组关联研究的因果解释
bioRxiv. 2023 Nov 16:2023.11.13.566950. doi: 10.1101/2023.11.13.566950.
4
Inferring Economic Impacts from a Program's Physical Outcomes: An Application to Forest Protection in Thailand.从项目的实际成果推断经济影响：泰国森林保护的一个应用实例
Environ Resour Econ (Dordr). 2023;84(3):845-876. doi: 10.1007/s10640-021-00644-z. Epub 2022 Feb 6.
5
Expedited editorial decision in COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间的快速编辑决策
J Informetr. 2023 Feb;17(1):101382. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2023.101382. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
6
Rethinking the framework constructed by counterfactual functional model.重新思考由反事实功能模型构建的框架。
Appl Intell (Dordr). 2022;52(11):12957-12974. doi: 10.1007/s10489-022-03161-8. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
7
Heterogeneous Treatment Effects in the Presence of Self-Selection: A Propensity Score Perspective.存在自我选择时的异质性治疗效果：倾向得分视角
Sociol Methodol. 2020 Aug;50(1):350-385. doi: 10.1177/0081175019862593. Epub 2019 Aug 2.
8
Marginal Treatment Effects from a Propensity Score Perspective.倾向得分视角下的边际治疗效果
J Polit Econ. 2019 Dec;127(6):3070-3084. doi: 10.1086/702172.
9
Declaring and Diagnosing Research Designs.声明与诊断研究设计。
Am Polit Sci Rev. 2019 Aug;113(3):838-859. doi: 10.1017/s0003055419000194. Epub 2019 May 31.
10
Returns to Education: The Causal Effects of Education on Earnings, Health, and Smoking.回归教育：教育对收入、健康和吸烟的因果效应。
J Polit Econ. 2018 Oct;126(Suppl 1):S197-S246. doi: 10.1086/698760.
本文引用的文献
1
Assessing the Impact of a School Subsidy Program in Mexico: Using a Social Experiment to Validate a Dynamic Behavioral Model of Child Schooling and Fertility.评估墨西哥学校补贴计划的影响：利用社会实验验证儿童教育和生育的动态行为模型。
Am Econ Rev. 2006 Dec;96(5):1384-1417. doi: 10.1257/aer.96.5.1384.
2
Estimating Marginal Returns to Education.估算教育的边际回报。
Am Econ Rev. 2011 Oct;101(6):2754-2781. doi: 10.1257/aer.101.6.2754.
3
ESTIMATING WELFARE IN INSURANCE MARKETS USING VARIATION IN PRICES.利用价格变化估计保险市场中的福利
Q J Econ. 2010 Aug 1;125(3):877-921. doi: 10.1162/qjec.2010.125.3.877.
4
Testing the Correlated Random Coefficient Model.检验相关随机系数模型。
J Econom. 2010 Oct 1;158(2):177-203. doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2010.01.005.
5
Comparing IV With Structural Models: What Simple IV Can and Cannot Identify.比较工具变量法与结构模型：简单工具变量法能够识别和无法识别的内容。
J Econom. 2010 May 1;156(1):27-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2009.09.006.
6
Evaluating Marginal Policy Changes and the Average Effect of Treatment for Individuals at the Margin.评估边际政策变化及处于边际状态个体的治疗平均效果。
Econometrica. 2010 Jan 1;78(1):377-394. doi: 10.3982/ECTA7089.
7
Local instrumental variables and latent variable models for identifying and bounding treatment effects.用于识别和界定治疗效果的局部工具变量和潜在变量模型。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Apr 13;96(8):4730-4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.8.4730.
Zotero 插件