Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, Britton Chance Center for Biomedical Photonics, Wuhan, China.
J Biomed Opt. 2010 Jan-Feb;15(1):016003. doi: 10.1117/1.3290804.
Laser speckle contrast imaging is a technique used for imaging blood flow without scanning. Though several studies have attempted to combine spatial and temporal statistics of laser speckle images for reducing image noise as well as preserving acceptable spatiotemporal resolution, the statistical accuracy of these spatiotemporal methods has not been thoroughly compared. Through numerical simulation and animal experiments, this study investigates the changes in the mean speckle contrast values and the relative noise of the speckle contrast images computed by these methods with various numbers of frames and spatial windows. The simulation results show that the maximum relative error of the mean speckle contrast computed by the spatiotemporal laser speckle contrast analysis (STLASCA) method, in which the speckle contrast images are computed by analyzing the 3-D spatiotemporal speckle image cube, is approximately 5%, while it is higher than 13% for other methods. Changes in the mean speckle contrast values and the relative noise computed by these methods for animal experiment data are consistent with the simulation results. Our results demonstrate that STLASCA achieves more accurate speckle contrast, and suggest that STLASCA most effectively utilizes the number of pixels, thus achieving maximized speckle contrast, and thereby maximizing the variation of the laser speckle contrast image.
激光散斑对比成像技术用于无需扫描即可进行血流成像。尽管有几项研究试图结合激光散斑图像的空间和时间统计信息来降低图像噪声并保持可接受的时空分辨率,但这些时空方法的统计准确性尚未得到彻底比较。本研究通过数值模拟和动物实验,研究了这些方法在不同帧数和空间窗口下计算的平均散斑对比度值和散斑对比度图像的相对噪声的变化。模拟结果表明,通过三维时空散斑图像立方体分析计算散斑对比度图像的时空激光散斑对比度分析(STLASCA)方法计算的平均散斑对比度的最大相对误差约为 5%,而其他方法的相对误差高于 13%。这些方法计算的动物实验数据的平均散斑对比度值和相对噪声的变化与模拟结果一致。我们的结果表明,STLASCA 可实现更准确的散斑对比度,并表明 STLASCA 最有效地利用了像素数量,从而实现了最大的散斑对比度,并使激光散斑对比度图像的变化最大化。