Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
J Prosthodont. 2010 Jun;19(4):279-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00568.x. Epub 2010 Feb 19.
The purpose of this study was to assess the performance of an intraoral dental colorimeter.
In vivo repeatability of an intraoral colorimeter was assessed by performing color measurements of 30 individuals' right maxillary central incisor. Three consecutive measurements from each individual were made. In the in vitro part of the study, 25 metal-ceramic and 25 all-ceramic specimens were prepared. Five shades of metal-ceramic and all-ceramic specimens were selected for color determination. A widely recognized in vitro colorimeter was used as the control group for the in vitro performance assessment of the in vivo colorimeter. The color differentiation capability of two colorimeters was compared with the readings obtained from ceramic specimens. DeltaE values between shade groups of ceramic specimens were calculated and statistically analyzed with Student's t-test. The repeatability of the intraoral instrument was evaluated statistically with Intraclass correlation coefficient.
The in vivo evaluation results showed that the overall repeatability coefficient values of L*, a*, and b* notations of the intraoral colorimeter were "excellent." The color differences (DeltaE) calculated between the colorimeters were significant only between shades A(1)-B(1) for metal-ceramic specimens (p= 0.002); however, from 5 of 10 shade couples of all-ceramic specimens, the color differences obtained from the readings of the in vivo colorimeter were significantly different from that of the in vitro colorimeter (p < 0.001). For all specimens, the differences between DeltaE values were within clinically acceptable limits (<3.5).
Within the limitations of this study, the intraoral colorimeter exhibited successful in vivo repeatability; however, the color difference detection performance of the device varied depending on the translucency of the specimens.
本研究旨在评估一种口腔内牙科比色仪的性能。
通过对 30 名个体右上颌中切牙进行颜色测量,评估口腔内比色仪的体内重复性。对每位个体进行三次连续测量。在研究的体外部分,制备了 25 个金属陶瓷和 25 个全陶瓷标本。选择了五种金属陶瓷和全陶瓷标本的色调进行颜色测定。使用公认的体外比色仪作为对照组,评估体内比色仪的体外性能。比较了两种比色仪的颜色区分能力与陶瓷标本的读数。计算陶瓷标本的色调组之间的 DeltaE 值,并使用学生 t 检验进行统计学分析。使用组内相关系数评估体内仪器的重复性。
体内评估结果表明,口腔内比色仪的 L*、a和 b值的总体重复性系数值为“优秀”。两种比色仪之间计算的颜色差异(DeltaE)仅在金属陶瓷标本的 A(1)-B(1)色调组之间具有统计学意义(p=0.002);然而,在 10 对全陶瓷标本的色调中,有 5 对来自体内比色仪读数的颜色差异与体外比色仪显著不同(p<0.001)。对于所有标本,DeltaE 值之间的差异在临床可接受的范围内(<3.5)。
在本研究的限制范围内,口腔内比色仪表现出良好的体内重复性;然而,该设备的颜色差异检测性能取决于标本的半透明度。