• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用口腔内数字扫描仪对比色板颜色测量的临床应用可能性研究。

A Study on Possibility of Clinical Application for Color Measurements of Shade Guides Using an Intraoral Digital Scanner.

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, Seoul National University School of Dentistry, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Clinical Oral Health Science, Graduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Prosthodont. 2018 Aug;27(7):670-675. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12559. Epub 2016 Nov 7.

DOI:10.1111/jopr.12559
PMID:29377326
Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess if color measurement with intraoral scanner correlates with digital colorimeter and to evaluate the possibility of application of a digital scanner for shade selection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Lab* values of the five shade tabs (A1, A2, A3, A3.5, and A4) were obtained with an intraoral scanner (TRIOS Pod) and a colorimeter (ShadeEye). Both devices were calibrated according to the manufacturer's instructions before measurements. Color measurement values were compared with paired t-test, and a Pearson's correlation analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship of two methods.

RESULTS

The Lab* values of the colorimeter were significantly different from those of the digital scanner (p < 0.001). The L* and b* values of both methods were strongly correlated with each other (both p < 0.05). The device repeatability in both methods were reported to be excellent (p < 0.05). Within the limitations of this study, color measurements with digital intraoral scanners and computer-assisted image analysis were in accordance with those of the colorimeter with respect to L* and b* values; however, all the coordinates of shade tabs were significantly different between two methods.

CONCLUSIONS

The digital intraoral scanner may not be used as the primary method of color selection in clinical practices, considering significant differences in color parameters with colorimeter. The scanner's capability in shade selection should be further evaluated.

摘要

目的

评估口腔内扫描仪的颜色测量值与数字比色计是否相关,并评估数字扫描仪用于比色选择的可能性。

材料与方法

使用口腔内扫描仪(TRIOS Pod)和比色计(ShadeEye)获取五个比色片(A1、A2、A3、A3.5 和 A4)的 Lab*值。在测量之前,根据制造商的说明对两个设备进行了校准。使用配对 t 检验比较颜色测量值,并进行 Pearson 相关性分析以评估两种方法之间的关系。

结果

比色计的 Lab值与数字扫描仪的 Lab值显著不同(p < 0.001)。两种方法的 L和 b值彼此之间具有很强的相关性(均 p < 0.05)。两种方法的设备重复性均被报道为优秀(p < 0.05)。在本研究的限制范围内,数字口腔内扫描仪和计算机辅助图像分析的颜色测量值与比色计的 L和 b值一致;然而,两种方法的比色片所有坐标均存在显著差异。

结论

考虑到与比色计相比颜色参数存在显著差异,数字口腔内扫描仪可能不能用作临床比色选择的主要方法。应进一步评估扫描仪在比色选择方面的能力。

相似文献

1
A Study on Possibility of Clinical Application for Color Measurements of Shade Guides Using an Intraoral Digital Scanner.采用口腔内数字扫描仪对比色板颜色测量的临床应用可能性研究。
J Prosthodont. 2018 Aug;27(7):670-675. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12559. Epub 2016 Nov 7.
2
Could digital imaging be an alternative for digital colorimeters?数字成像技术能否替代数字比色计?
Clin Oral Investig. 2010 Dec;14(6):713-8. doi: 10.1007/s00784-009-0329-6. Epub 2009 Aug 18.
3
The use of digital imaging for colour matching and communication in restorative dentistry.数字成像在口腔修复学中用于颜色匹配和交流的应用。
Br Dent J. 2005 Jul 9;199(1):43-9; discussion 33. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4812559.
4
In vivo and in vitro assessment of an intraoral dental colorimeter.口腔内牙科比色计的体内和体外评估。
J Prosthodont. 2010 Jun;19(4):279-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00568.x. Epub 2010 Feb 19.
5
Comparing the effectiveness of shade measurement by intraoral scanner, digital spectrophotometer, and visual shade assessment.比较口腔内扫描仪、数字分光光度计和比色评估在比色测量中的效果。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021 Dec;33(8):1166-1174. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12810. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
6
Evaluation of visual and instrument shade matching.视觉与器械比色评估。
J Prosthet Dent. 1998 Dec;80(6):642-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(98)70049-6.
7
The repeatability of an intraoral dental colorimeter.口腔内牙齿比色仪的可重复性。
J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Dec;88(6):585-90. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2002.129803.
8
In vivo tooth-color measurement with a new 3D intraoral scanning system in comparison to conventional digital and visual color determination methods.使用新型三维口腔内扫描系统进行活体牙齿颜色测量,并与传统数字和视觉颜色测定方法进行比较。
Int J Comput Dent. 2017;20(4):343-361.
9
Evaluating the accuracy of tooth color measurement by combining the Munsell color system and dental colorimeter.结合孟塞尔颜色系统和牙科比色仪评估牙齿颜色测量的准确性。
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2012 Sep;28(9):490-4. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2012.04.006. Epub 2012 Jul 7.
10
A comparison between visual, intraoral scanner, and spectrophotometer shade matching: A clinical study.视觉比色、口内扫描仪和分光光度计比色的比较:一项临床研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Feb;121(2):271-275. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.05.004. Epub 2018 Oct 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of ambient lighting conditions on the scanning accuracy and shade matching capability of intraoral scanners: an in vitro study.环境光照条件对口腔内扫描仪扫描精度和颜色匹配能力的影响:一项体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 3;25(1):1088. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06446-9.
2
Practical Implications in Contemporary Dental Aesthetics-Shade Selection Assessment Using Intraoral Scanners.当代牙科美学中的实际应用——使用口腔内扫描仪进行比色评估
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Jan 20;13(1):43. doi: 10.3390/dj13010043.
3
Comparative evaluation of intraoral scanners and a spectrophotometer for percent correct shade identification in clinical dentistry.
口腔内扫描仪与分光光度计在临床牙科中进行颜色匹配正确率比较评估。
Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Jan 2;29(1):39. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-06124-0.
4
Current trends in digital shade matching - A scoping review.数字比色的当前趋势——一项范围综述。
Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2024 Dec;60:211-219. doi: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2024.10.001. Epub 2024 Oct 19.
5
Impact of different lighting conditions on the tooth-shade selection using intra-oral scanners: An study.不同光照条件对使用口腔内扫描仪进行牙齿比色的影响:一项研究。
Heliyon. 2024 Oct 2;10(19):e38870. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38870. eCollection 2024 Oct 15.
6
A comparative study of shade-matching performance using intraoral scanner, spectrophotometer, and visual assessment.采用口腔内扫描仪、分光光度计和视觉评估进行比色匹配性能的比较研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 9;14(1):23640. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74354-z.
7
Color Comparison Between Intraoral Scanner and Spectrophotometer Shade Matching: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.口腔内扫描仪与分光光度计比色的颜色比较:系统评价与Meta分析
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2025 Feb;37(2):361-377. doi: 10.1111/jerd.13309. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
8
Effect of different instrumental techniques and clinical experience on shade matching.不同仪器技术和临床经验对比色的影响。
J Prosthodont. 2025 Jul;34(6):609-616. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13894. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
9
Clinical Comparative Study of Shade Measurement Using Two Methods: Dental Guides and Spectrophotometry.两种方法进行比色测量的临床对比研究:牙模导向法与分光光度法
Biomedicines. 2024 Apr 9;12(4):825. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12040825.
10
Comparison of different digital shade selection methodologies in terms of accuracy.不同数字比色方法在准确性方面的比较。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2024 Feb;16(1):38-47. doi: 10.4047/jap.2024.16.1.38. Epub 2024 Feb 23.