Anderson Gary C, Gonzalez Yoly M, Ohrbach Richard, Truelove Edmond L, Sommers Earl, Look John O, Schiffman Eric L
Department of Development and Surgical Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
J Orofac Pain. 2010 Winter;24(1):79-88.
The Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) Validation Project has provided the first comprehensive assessment of reliability and validity of the original Axis I and II. In addition, Axis I of the RDC/TMD was revised with estimates of reliability and validity. These findings are reported in the five preceding articles in this series. The aim of this article is to present further revisions of Axis I and II for consideration by the TMD research and clinical communities. Potential Axis I revisions include addressing concerns with orofacial pain differential diagnosis and changes in nomenclature in an attempt to provide improved consistency with other musculoskeletal diagnostic systems. In addition, expansion of the RDC/TMD to include the less common TMD conditions and disorders would make it more comprehensive and clinically useful. The original standards for diagnostic sensitivity ( < or = 0.70) and specificity (< or = 0.95) should be reconsidered to reflect changes in the field since the RDC/TMD was published in 1992. Pertaining to Axis II, current recommendations for all chronic pain conditions include standardized instruments and expansion of the domains assessed. In addition, there is need for improved clinical efficiency of Axis II instruments and for exploring methods to better integrate Axis I and II in clinical settings.
颞下颌关节紊乱病研究诊断标准(RDC/TMD)验证项目首次对原有的轴I和轴II的信度和效度进行了全面评估。此外,RDC/TMD的轴I根据信度和效度估计值进行了修订。本系列前5篇文章报告了这些研究结果。本文旨在提出轴I和轴II的进一步修订内容,供颞下颌关节紊乱病研究和临床领域的人士参考。轴I可能的修订包括解决口腔面部疼痛鉴别诊断方面的问题以及术语的变化,以使其与其他肌肉骨骼诊断系统的一致性得到改善。此外,扩大RDC/TMD以纳入较不常见的颞下颌关节紊乱病情况和病症将使其更全面且在临床上更有用。自1992年RDC/TMD发布以来,应重新考虑诊断敏感性(≤0.70)和特异性(≤0.95)的原始标准,以反映该领域的变化。关于轴II,目前针对所有慢性疼痛病症的建议包括使用标准化工具以及扩大评估领域。此外,需要提高轴II工具的临床效率,并探索在临床环境中更好地整合轴I和轴II的方法。