Suppr超能文献

修订后的研究性诊断标准轴 I 对颞下颌关节紊乱疾病(RDC/TMD)的可靠性和有效性。

Reliability and validity of Axis I of the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) with proposed revisions.

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic & Biological Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

出版信息

J Oral Rehabil. 2010 Oct;37(10):744-59. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02121.x. Epub 2010 Jul 20.

Abstract

The research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (RDC/TMD) have been employed internationally since 1992 for the study of temporomandibular muscle and joint disorders (TMD). This diagnostic protocol incorporates a dual system for assessment of TMD for Axis I physical diagnoses as well as Axis II psychological status and pain-related disability. Because the reliability and criterion validity of RDC/TMD had not yet been comprehensively characterised, the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research funded in 2001 the most definitive research to date on the RDC/TMD as a U01 project entitled, 'Research Diagnostic Criteria: Reliability and Validity'. The results of this multi-site collaboration involving the University of Minnesota, the University of Washington, and the University at Buffalo were first reported at a pre-session workshop of the Toronto general session of the International Association of Dental Research on 2 July 2008. Summaries of five reports from this meeting are presented in this paper including: (i) reliability of RDC/TMD Axis I diagnoses based on clinical signs and symptoms; (ii) reliability of radiographic interpretations used for RDC/TMD Axis I diagnoses; (iii) reliability of self-report data used for RDC/TMD Axis I diagnoses; (iv) validity of RDC/TMD Axis I diagnoses based on clinical signs and symptoms; and (v) proposed revisions of the RDC/TMD Axis I diagnostic algorithms.

摘要

自 1992 年以来,国际上一直采用颞下颌关节紊乱病研究诊断标准(RDC/TMD)来研究颞下颌肌肉和关节紊乱病(TMD)。该诊断方案采用了双重系统来评估 TMD,包括 I 轴的物理诊断以及 II 轴的心理状态和与疼痛相关的残疾。由于 RDC/TMD 的可靠性和标准效度尚未得到全面描述,美国国立牙科和颅面研究所于 2001 年资助了迄今为止最具权威性的 RDC/TMD 研究,该研究作为 U01 项目题为“研究诊断标准:可靠性和有效性”。该多地点合作的结果涉及明尼苏达大学、华盛顿大学和布法罗大学,首先在 2008 年 7 月 2 日于多伦多国际牙科研究协会全体会议的会前研讨会上进行了报告。本文介绍了该会议的五份报告摘要,包括:(i)基于临床体征和症状的 RDC/TMD I 轴诊断的可靠性;(ii)用于 RDC/TMD I 轴诊断的放射学解释的可靠性;(iii)用于 RDC/TMD I 轴诊断的自我报告数据的可靠性;(iv)基于临床体征和症状的 RDC/TMD I 轴诊断的有效性;以及(v)RDC/TMD I 轴诊断算法的修订建议。

相似文献

1
Reliability and validity of Axis I of the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) with proposed revisions.
J Oral Rehabil. 2010 Oct;37(10):744-59. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02121.x. Epub 2010 Jul 20.
3
Some remarks on the RDC/TMD Validation Project: report of an IADR/Toronto-2008 workshop discussion.
J Oral Rehabil. 2010 Oct;37(10):779-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02091.x. Epub 2010 Mar 29.
10
Assessment and further development of RDC/TMD Axis II biobehavioural instruments: a research programme progress report.
J Oral Rehabil. 2010 Oct;37(10):784-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02144.x. Epub 2010 Aug 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Haematologic Data Improves Long-Term Prediction Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence Models for Temporomandibular Disorders.
J Oral Rehabil. 2025 Oct;52(10):1641-1650. doi: 10.1111/joor.14030. Epub 2025 May 14.
2
Temporomandibular disorder prevalence in malocclusion patients: a meta-analysis.
Head Face Med. 2025 Feb 26;21(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13005-025-00490-0.
4
Clinical aspects of mastication myalgia-an overview.
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2024 Jan 9;4:1306475. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2023.1306475. eCollection 2023.
6
[Prevalence of temporomandibular disorders in seniors-Symptom-related analyses in younger and older seniors].
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2022 Oct;55(6):482-488. doi: 10.1007/s00391-021-01954-z. Epub 2021 Aug 5.

本文引用的文献

5
Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (RDC/TMD): development of image analysis criteria and examiner reliability for image analysis.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 Jun;107(6):844-60. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.02.023.
7
Reliability of clinical temporomandibular disorder diagnoses.
Pain. 2005 Nov;118(1-2):61-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2005.07.018. Epub 2005 Sep 9.
8
Modeling kappa for measuring dependent categorical agreement data.
Biostatistics. 2000 Jun;1(2):191-202. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/1.2.191.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验