Suppr超能文献

有没有一种通用的术语来量化物种多样性?

A consistent terminology for quantifying species diversity?

机构信息

Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas (CIB), Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo, AP 69, 42001, Pachuca, Hidalgo, Mexico.

出版信息

Oecologia. 2010 Jun;163(2):279-82. doi: 10.1007/s00442-010-1591-7. Epub 2010 Mar 6.

Abstract

There is a genuine need for consensus on a clear terminology in the study of species diversity given that the nature of the components of diversity is the subject of an ongoing debate and may be the key to understanding changes in ecosystem processes. A recent and thought-provoking paper (Jurasinski et al. Oecologia 159:15-26, 2009) draws attention to the lack of precision with which the terms alpha, beta, and gamma diversity are used and proposes three new terms in their place. While this valuable effort may improve our understanding of the different facets of species diversity, it still leaves us far from achieving a consistent terminology. As such, the conceptual contribution of these authors is limited and does little to elucidate the facets of species diversity. It is, however, a good starting point for an in-depth review of the available concepts and methods.

摘要

鉴于多样性的组成部分的性质是一个正在进行的争论的主题,并且可能是理解生态系统过程变化的关键,因此在物种多样性的研究中需要就明确的术语达成真正的共识。最近有一篇发人深省的论文(Jurasinski 等人,《生态学》159:15-26,2009)提请注意缺乏精度使用阿尔法、贝塔和伽马多样性的术语,并提出了三个新的术语来替代它们。虽然这一有价值的努力可能会提高我们对物种多样性不同方面的理解,但它仍然使我们远远无法实现一致的术语。因此,这些作者的概念贡献是有限的,并没有很好地阐明物种多样性的各个方面。然而,这是对现有概念和方法进行深入审查的一个很好的起点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验