Radiotherapy Department, Pôle Régional de Cancérologie, CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers Cedex 9, France.
Support Care Cancer. 2010 Aug;18(8):1033-8. doi: 10.1007/s00520-010-0847-4. Epub 2010 Mar 6.
This systematic review represents a thorough evaluation of the literature to clarify the impact of cancer therapies on the prevalence, quality of life and economic impact, and management strategies for cancer-therapy-induced trismus.
A systematic literature search was conducted with assistance from a research librarian in the databases MEDLINE/PubMed and EMBASE for articles published between January 1, 1990 and December 31, 2008. Each study was independently assessed by two reviewers. Taking into account predetermined quality measures, a weighted prevalence was calculated for the prevalence of trismus. The level of evidence, recommendation grade, and guideline (if possible) were given for published preventive and management strategies for trismus.
We reviewed a total of 22 published studies between 1990 and 2008. Most of them assessed the prevalence of this complication, and few focused on management. The weighted prevalence for trismus was 25.4% in patients who received conventional radiotherapy and 5% for the few intensity-modulated radiation therapy studies. No clear guideline recommendations could be made for the prevention or management of trismus.
Newer radiation modalities may decrease the prevalence of trismus compared to conventional radiotherapy. Few studies have addressed the quality of life impact of trismus, and no studies were identified to assess the economic impact of trismus. The few preventive and management trials identified in the literature showed some promise, although larger, well-designed studies are required to appropriately assess these therapies before recommendations can be provided.
本系统综述对文献进行了全面评估,旨在阐明癌症治疗对癌症治疗相关性牙关紧闭症的发生率、生活质量和经济影响的作用,以及癌症治疗相关性牙关紧闭症的管理策略。
在研究图书馆员的协助下,在 MEDLINE/PubMed 和 EMBASE 数据库中对 1990 年 1 月 1 日至 2008 年 12 月 31 日期间发表的文章进行了系统的文献检索。由两名评审员独立评估每一项研究。根据预定的质量标准,对牙关紧闭症的发生率进行加权计算。对已发表的关于预防和治疗牙关紧闭症的预防和管理策略,给出了证据水平、推荐等级和指南(如果可能的话)。
我们共查阅了 1990 年至 2008 年间发表的 22 篇研究报告。其中大部分研究评估了这种并发症的发生率,只有少数研究集中在管理上。接受常规放疗的患者中,牙关紧闭症的加权发生率为 25.4%,而少数调强放疗研究中发生率为 5%。对于预防或治疗牙关紧闭症,尚无明确的指南推荐。
与常规放疗相比,新的放疗方式可能会降低牙关紧闭症的发生率。少数研究探讨了牙关紧闭症对生活质量的影响,也没有研究评估牙关紧闭症的经济影响。文献中确定的少数预防和治疗试验显示出一定的前景,但需要更大规模、精心设计的研究来适当评估这些疗法,然后才能提供建议。