Suppr超能文献

控释阿片类药物的给药频率与癌痛控制中剂量末失败的发生率:一项韩国多中心研究。

The dosing frequency of sustained-release opioids and the prevalence of end-of-dose failure in cancer pain control: a Korean multicenter study.

机构信息

Division of Medical Oncology, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2010 Feb;19(2):297-301. doi: 10.1007/s00520-010-0825-x. Epub 2010 Mar 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

End-of-dose failure is commonly observed as therapeutic levels of sustained-release opioids fall. However, little is known about using these medications for cancer pain control. To determine the dosing frequency of sustained-release opioids (morphine, oxycodone, and transdermal fentanyl) and the prevalence of end-of-dose failure in clinical practice, a patient-reported survey was performed.

METHODS

A multicenter survey was conducted in 56 hospitals in Korea between June and November 2008.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 1,097 cancer outpatients who were prescribed oral sustained-release opioids (morphine or oxycodone) or transdermal fentanyl. Of the oral sustained-release opioid patients, 67.0% took oral sustained-release oral opioids twice daily, while 26.2% took them more than twice daily. Of the transdermal fentanyl patients, 88.8% wore the patch for 72 h. Of the enrolled patients, 48.3% experienced worsening pain just before the next sustained-release opioid dose, and 36.8% of these patients took medication earlier than the prescribed dosing schedule. Patients felt that oral sustained-release opioids gave adequate pain control lasting an average of 9.6 h, versus an average of 62.9 h for transdermal fentanyl.

CONCLUSION

This survey demonstrated that sustained-release opioids are used by patients in a manner that is inconsistent with standard recommendations. End-of-dose failure is suggested to explain increased dosing frequency, and patients reported that adequate pain relief lasted for less time than was stated in the manufacturers' prescription recommendation.

摘要

背景

当控释阿片类药物的治疗水平下降时,通常会出现剂量末期失败。然而,对于这些药物在癌症疼痛控制中的应用,我们知之甚少。为了确定控释阿片类药物(吗啡、羟考酮和芬太尼透皮贴剂)的给药频率和剂量末期失败的发生率,我们进行了一项患者报告调查。

方法

2008 年 6 月至 11 月,在韩国的 56 家医院进行了一项多中心调查。

结果

该研究纳入了 1097 例接受口服控释阿片类药物(吗啡或羟考酮)或芬太尼透皮贴剂治疗的癌症门诊患者。在口服控释阿片类药物患者中,67.0%每天服用 2 次口服控释阿片类药物,而 26.2%每天服用超过 2 次。在芬太尼透皮贴剂患者中,88.8%的患者贴用时间为 72 h。在纳入的患者中,48.3%在下次服用控释阿片类药物前疼痛加重,其中 36.8%的患者比规定的给药时间表提前服药。患者认为口服控释阿片类药物能平均持续 9.6 h 有效控制疼痛,而芬太尼透皮贴剂的平均持续时间为 62.9 h。

结论

本调查表明,患者使用控释阿片类药物的方式与标准建议不一致。剂量末期失败可能是导致给药频率增加的原因,患者报告称,与制造商的处方建议相比,他们获得的充分止痛时间较短。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验