School of Psychology, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, Lancashire, United Kingdom.
Aggress Behav. 2010 May-Jun;36(3):177-86. doi: 10.1002/ab.20340.
The aim of this study was to assess both violent and nonviolent offending behavior in a single, mixed-sex population. The rationale for this is that the two types of offending are usually researched separately, despite evidence that they overlap. A comprehensive measure of general violence, intimate partner violence (IPV), and nonviolent offending behavior was administered to 116 men and 181 women, together with measures of personality and personality disorder (PD) traits, to investigate whether predictors of violent and nonviolent offending were similar or different for men and women. Men were found to perpetrate higher levels of general violence and nonviolent offenses than women, but women perpetrated significantly more IPV than men. Cluster B PD traits predicted all three offense types for women and also men's general violence and nonviolent offending. Women's general violence and men's non-violence also had one unique risk factor each, low agreeableness, and low conscientiousness, respectively. The main difference was for IPV, where men's IPV was predicted by cluster A PD traits, indicating that men's and women's risk factors for IPV may be different, although their risk factors for the other offense types were fairly consistent.
这项研究的目的是评估单一的、混合性别的人群中的暴力和非暴力犯罪行为。这样做的理由是,尽管有证据表明这两种犯罪行为是重叠的,但它们通常是分开研究的。我们向 116 名男性和 181 名女性同时提供了一般暴力、亲密伴侣暴力 (IPV) 和非暴力犯罪行为的综合衡量标准,以及人格和人格障碍 (PD) 特征的衡量标准,以调查暴力和非暴力犯罪行为的预测因素对男性和女性是否相似或不同。结果发现,男性实施的一般暴力和非暴力犯罪行为的程度高于女性,但女性实施的 IPV 明显多于男性。B 群 PD 特征预测了女性的所有三种犯罪类型,也预测了男性的一般暴力和非暴力犯罪行为。女性的一般暴力和男性的非暴力犯罪行为也各有一个独特的风险因素,分别是低宜人性和低尽责性。主要的区别在于 IPV,男性的 IPV 是由 A 群 PD 特征预测的,这表明男性和女性的 IPV 风险因素可能不同,尽管他们其他犯罪类型的风险因素相当一致。