Suppr超能文献

野外灵长类动物学家面临的伦理问题:提出相关问题。

Ethical issues faced by field primatologists: asking the relevant questions.

机构信息

Department of Anthropology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Am J Primatol. 2010 Sep;72(9):754-71. doi: 10.1002/ajp.20814.

Abstract

Field primatologists face unusual ethical issues. We study animals rather than people and receive research approval from animal care rather than ethics committees. However, animal care evaluation forms are developed from concerns about laboratory animal research and are based on the "Three R's" for humane treatment of captive experimental subjects (replacement, reduction and refinement), which are only debatably relevant to field research. Scientists who study wild, free-ranging primates in host countries experience many ethical dilemmas seldom dealt with in animal care forms. This paper reviews the ethical issues many field primatologists say they face and how these might be better addressed by animal care forms. The ethical issues arising for field researchers are divided into three categories: "Presence, Protocols and People" and for each the most frequent issues are described. The most commonly mentioned ethical concern arising from our presence in the field is the possibility of disease transmission. Although most primate field studies employ only observational protocols, the practice of habituating our study animals to close human presence is an ethical concern for many since it can lessen the animals' fear of all humans, thereby facilitating undesirable behaviors (e.g., crop-raiding) and rendering them vulnerable to harm. Field primatologists who work in host countries must observe national laws and local traditions. As conservationists, primatologists must often negotiate between the resource needs and cultural practices of local people and the interests of the nonhuman primates. Many say they face more ethical dilemmas arising from human interactions than from research on the animals per se. This review concludes with suggestions for relevant questions to ask on animal care forms, and actions that field primatologists can take to better inform animal care committees about the common ethical issues we experience as well as how to develop guidelines for addressing them.

摘要

野外灵长类动物学家面临着不同寻常的伦理问题。我们研究的是动物而不是人类,并且从动物护理部门而不是伦理委员会获得研究批准。然而,动物护理评估表是根据实验室动物研究的关注点制定的,并且基于对圈养实验动物进行人道处理的“三 R”原则(替代、减少和优化),而这些原则仅在一定程度上与野外研究相关。在东道国研究野生自由放养灵长类动物的科学家们会遇到许多在动物护理表格中很少涉及的伦理困境。本文回顾了许多野外灵长类动物学家表示他们所面临的伦理问题,以及动物护理表格如何更好地解决这些问题。对于野外研究人员来说,出现的伦理问题分为三类:“存在、方案和人员”,并对每一类中最常见的问题进行了描述。在野外工作中,我们最常提到的伦理问题是疾病传播的可能性。尽管大多数灵长类野外研究仅采用观察方案,但让我们的研究动物习惯接近人类的做法却引起了许多人的关注,因为这会减少动物对所有人类的恐惧,从而助长不受欢迎的行为(例如,破坏庄稼),并使它们容易受到伤害。在东道国工作的野外灵长类动物学家必须遵守国家法律和当地传统。作为自然资源保护主义者,灵长类动物学家必须在当地人民的资源需求和文化习俗与非人类灵长类动物的利益之间进行协商。许多人表示,他们面临的更多伦理困境来自于人类的相互作用,而不是来自于对动物本身的研究。本文的结论是提出在动物护理表格中应提出的相关问题,以及野外灵长类动物学家可以采取的行动,以便更好地向动物护理委员会通报我们所面临的常见伦理问题,并制定解决这些问题的准则。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验