评价一种算法,以指导接受持续皮下胰岛素输注治疗的 1 型糖尿病患者如何对实时连续血糖水平做出反应:一项随机对照试验。

Evaluation of an algorithm to guide patients with type 1 diabetes treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion on how to respond to real-time continuous glucose levels: a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, St Vincent's Hospital, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2010 Jun;33(6):1242-8. doi: 10.2337/dc09-1481. Epub 2010 Mar 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate an algorithm guiding responses of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII)-treated type 1 diabetic patients using real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RT-CGM).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Sixty CSII-treated type 1 diabetic participants (aged 13-70 years, including adult and adolescent subgroups, with A1C <or=9.5%) were randomized in age-, sex-, and A1C-matched pairs. Phase 1 was an open 16-week multicenter randomized controlled trial. Group A was treated with CSII/RT-CGM with the algorithm, and group B was treated with CSII/RT-CGM without the algorithm. The primary outcome was the difference in time in target (4-10 mmol/l) glucose range on 6-day masked CGM. Secondary outcomes were differences in A1C, low (<or=3.9 mmol/l) glucose CGM time, and glycemic variability. Phase 2 was the week 16-32 follow-up. Group A was returned to usual care, and group B was provided with the algorithm. Glycemia parameters were as above. Comparisons were made between baseline and 16 weeks and 32 weeks.

RESULTS

In phase 1, after withdrawals 29 of 30 subjects were left in group A and 28 of 30 subjects were left in group B. The change in target glucose time did not differ between groups. A1C fell (mean 7.9% [95% CI 7.7-8.2to 7.6% [7.2-8.0]; P < 0.03) in group A but not in group B (7.8% [7.5-8.1] to 7.7 [7.3-8.0]; NS) with no difference between groups. More subjects in group A achieved A1C <or=7% than those in group B (2 of 29 to 14 of 29 vs. 4 of 28 to 7 of 28; P = 0.015). In phase 2, one participant was lost from each group. In group A, A1C returned to baseline with RT-CGM discontinuation but did not change in group B, who continued RT-CGM with addition of the algorithm.

CONCLUSIONS

Early but not late algorithm provision to type 1 diabetic patients using CSII/RT-CGM did not increase the target glucose time but increased achievement of A1C <or=7%. Upon RT-CGM cessation, A1C returned to baseline.

摘要

目的

评估一种基于实时连续血糖监测(RT-CGM)的算法,指导接受连续皮下胰岛素输注(CSII)治疗的 1 型糖尿病患者的治疗反应。

研究设计和方法

将 60 名接受 CSII 治疗的 1 型糖尿病患者(年龄 13-70 岁,包括成年和青少年亚组,A1C<9.5%)按年龄、性别和 A1C 匹配的对子随机分组。第 1 阶段为 16 周的多中心开放随机对照试验。A 组接受 CSII/RT-CGM 治疗加用该算法,B 组接受 CSII/RT-CGM 治疗但不加用该算法。主要结局是 6 天掩蔽式 CGM 中目标(4-10mmol/l)血糖范围内的时间差异。次要结局是 A1C、低血糖(<3.9mmol/l)CGM 时间和血糖变异性的差异。第 2 阶段是第 16-32 周的随访阶段。A 组恢复常规治疗,B 组提供该算法。血糖参数如上所述。比较基线时、第 16 周和第 32 周的结果。

结果

第 1 阶段,2 名受试者退出,29 名受试者留在 A 组,30 名受试者留在 B 组。两组目标血糖时间的变化无差异。A 组的 A1C 下降(平均 7.9%[95%CI 7.7-8.2]降至 7.6%[7.2-8.0];P<0.03),而 B 组无变化(7.8%[7.5-8.1]至 7.7[7.3-8.0];NS),两组间无差异。与 B 组(29 名中的 2 名)相比,A 组达到 A1C<7%的受试者更多(29 名中的 2 名)。第 2 阶段,每组各有 1 名受试者失访。A 组在停止 RT-CGM 后 A1C 恢复到基线,但 B 组继续使用 RT-CGM 并添加该算法后 A1C 未发生变化。

结论

在接受 CSII/RT-CGM 治疗的 1 型糖尿病患者中,早期但不是晚期提供算法并未增加目标血糖时间,但增加了 A1C<7%的达标率。停止 RT-CGM 后,A1C 恢复到基线。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d40e/2875432/f5c6ad99e420/zdc0061082660001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索