Cannon Christopher P, Hoekstra James W, Larson David M, Carter Reshma D, Cornish Jeanne, Karcher Rachel B, Mencia William A, Berry Carolyn A, Stowell Stephanie A
Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2010 Mar;9(1):23-9. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0b013e3181d09d2d.
The American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association guidelines are the nationally accepted standards for the treatment of patients with acute coronary syndromes. Despite this recognition, adherence to guideline recommendations remains suboptimal with 25% of opportunities to provide guideline appropriate care missed. To address performance gaps related to acute coronary syndrome care and improve patient outcomes, a performance improvement (PI) initiative was designed for cardiologists and emergency department physicians. As an American Medical Association-approved, standardized continuing medical education initiative, participating physicians can earn up to 20 American Medical Association-PRA Category 1 Credits by completing 2 phases of self-assessment in addition to developing and implementing a PI plan to address self-identified areas where improvement in patient care is needed. As the second in a series of 3 articles, this article describes the initial data submitted by 101 participating physicians and how their treatment practices compared with American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines as well as with current national standards. Overall, participating physicians meet guideline expectations with performance and documentation of a 12-lead electrocardiography, measurement of cardiac biomarkers, and administration of aspirin. Identified areas of improvement were the standardization of treatment protocols, use of risk assessment scores, appropriate dosing of anticoagulants, and improvement in patient treatment times. A noted challenge of this PI initiative is the low rate of physician participation, with fewer than 10% of registered physicians actively submitting patient data. This fact may reflect several barriers to PI, such as: (1) lack of time to collect and submit data, (2) the belief that current practices do not need to be improved, and (3) the need for system-based improvements.
美国心脏病学会和美国心脏协会的指南是全国公认的急性冠状动脉综合征患者治疗标准。尽管有此认可,但对指南建议的遵循情况仍不理想,有25%提供符合指南护理的机会被错过。为解决与急性冠状动脉综合征护理相关的绩效差距并改善患者预后,为心脏病专家和急诊科医生设计了一项绩效改进(PI)倡议。作为一项经美国医学协会批准的标准化继续医学教育倡议,参与的医生除了制定和实施PI计划以解决自我确定的需要改善患者护理的领域外,还可以通过完成两个阶段的自我评估获得高达20个美国医学协会-医师认可奖第1类学分。作为三篇系列文章中的第二篇,本文描述了101名参与医生提交的初始数据,以及他们的治疗实践与美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会指南以及当前国家标准的比较情况。总体而言,参与医生在12导联心电图的执行和记录、心脏生物标志物的测量以及阿司匹林的给药方面达到了指南期望。确定的改进领域包括治疗方案的标准化、风险评估分数的使用、抗凝剂的适当剂量以及患者治疗时间的改善。该PI倡议的一个显著挑战是医生参与率低,积极提交患者数据的注册医生不到10%。这一事实可能反映了PI的几个障碍,例如:(1)缺乏收集和提交数据的时间,(2)认为当前实践无需改进,以及(3)需要基于系统的改进。