Griffis C A
Nurse Anesth. 1991 Mar;2(1):28-32.
This case chronicles the effect of a retrobulbar block on a coincident general anesthetic for enucleation in an elderly man. This ASA II patient had a medical history of insulin-dependent diabetes with few apparent cardiovascular complications and mild chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Induction of anesthesia was accomplished with small doses of midazolam, droperidol, and alfentanil followed by thiamylal. The patient was intubated and maintained on isoflurane and nitrous oxide. A retrobulbar block was administered according to the surgeon's instructions without immediate, untoward consequences. Within 10 minutes the patient suffered a profound decrease in blood pressure and pulse requiring repeated doses of glycopyrrolate, phenylephrine, and ephedrine to maintain effective perfusion. These effects do not appear to have resulted from direct elicitation of the oculocardiac reflex, but rather from the loss of surgical stimuli from the block that essentially resulted in inadequate sympathetic tone. The author concludes that anesthetists in similar circumstances should anticipate the possibility of hypotension and lessened anesthetic requirements following retrobulbar block when coincident general anesthesia is planned.
本病例记录了球后阻滞对一名老年男性眼球摘除术同期全身麻醉的影响。这位美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级为II级的患者有胰岛素依赖型糖尿病病史,几乎没有明显的心血管并发症,还有轻度慢性阻塞性肺疾病。麻醉诱导采用小剂量咪达唑仑、氟哌利多和阿芬太尼,随后给予硫喷妥钠。患者插管后,维持异氟烷和氧化亚氮麻醉。按照外科医生的指示进行了球后阻滞,未立即出现不良后果。10分钟内,患者血压和脉搏急剧下降,需要反复给予格隆溴铵、去氧肾上腺素和麻黄碱以维持有效灌注。这些影响似乎并非直接诱发眼心反射所致,而是由于阻滞导致手术刺激消失,从而使交感神经张力不足。作者得出结论,在计划进行同期全身麻醉时,处于类似情况的麻醉医生应预料到球后阻滞后可能出现低血压以及麻醉需求降低的情况。