Department of Neuroanesthesiology, Neurosciences Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India.
J Anesth. 2010 Jun;24(3):482-5. doi: 10.1007/s00540-010-0905-6. Epub 2010 Mar 10.
Management of the airway is central to the practice of anesthesia. Several bedside airway assessment methods have been proposed for preoperative identification of patients who are difficult to intubate. The modified Mallampati test (MMT) remains a time-tested technique to date for recognizing an anticipated difficult tracheal intubation as assessed by Cormack-Lehane grade. Both Mallampati and its further modification by Samsoon and Young evaluate patients in the seated position. Recently a study mentioned a change in MMT score from sitting to supine position toward the higher side. However, there is a lack of data regarding the relationship of positional change in MMT with Cormack-Lehane grade. The aim of this prospective study was to assess if MMT score observed in sitting or supine position is a better predictor of difficult tracheal intubation. One hundred and twenty-three patients of ASA physical status I and II, aged 18-60 years, who were scheduled to undergo various neurosurgical procedures were enrolled for the study. We found that the MMT in supine position has a higher positive predictive value and is associated with more true positives as compared to MMT in the sitting position.
气道管理是麻醉实践的核心。已经提出了几种床边气道评估方法,用于术前识别可能难以插管的患者。改良的 Mallampati 试验(MMT)仍然是迄今为止用于识别预计困难气管插管的经过时间考验的技术,其通过 Cormack-Lehane 分级进行评估。Mallampati 及其由 Samsoon 和 Young 进一步修改的方法均在坐位评估患者。最近的一项研究提到,MMT 评分从坐位变为仰卧位时向更高的一侧变化。然而,关于 MMT 评分在仰卧位和坐位之间变化与 Cormack-Lehane 分级的关系的数据尚缺乏。本前瞻性研究旨在评估 MMT 评分在坐位或仰卧位时是否更能预测困难气管插管。我们招募了 123 名 ASA 身体状况 I 和 II 级、年龄在 18-60 岁之间的患者,他们计划接受各种神经外科手术。我们发现,与坐位 MMT 相比,仰卧位 MMT 的阳性预测值更高,并且与更多的真阳性相关。