Rass Marwan Abou
Prince AbdulRahman Advanced Dental Institute, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
J Oral Implantol. 2010;36(1):37-59. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-09-00040.
The immediate placement of implants in the fresh extraction sockets of infected teeth with periradicular and periapical lesions is contraindicated because of both the infection and the loss of architecture required for proper implant placement. There are 4 approaches for implant replacement of a hopeless tooth with lesions: (1) extraction and delayed implant placement; (2) extraction, debridement, guided bone regeneration (GBR), guided tissue regeneration (GTR), and delayed implant placement; (3) extraction, intrasocket debridement, and immediate implant placement; or (4) extraction, debridement, GBR, GTR, and simultaneous implant placement. The extraction of such hopeless teeth often results in large bone and soft tissue defects that are difficult to repair. This article introduces an alternative approach: interim endodontic implant site preparation, defined as a transitional, surgical, or nonsurgical endodontic treatment to regenerate the hopeless tooth bone defects and prepare the site for proper implant placement. This article describes 3 distinct interim endodontic protocols used to manage 5 patients, all of whom had severely infected hopeless teeth with large lesions and were treatment planned for implant replacement: the first, interim nonsurgical endodontic treatment to restore the normal anatomy of the infected hopeless tooth; the second, interim surgical endodontics on the hopeless tooth with preexisting endodontic treatment to regenerate apical bone for primary implant stability, thus avoiding the involvement of the maxillary sinus and other critical anatomic structures; and the third, interim surgical endodontics on the hopeless tooth with preexisting endodontic treatment to confine the size of the osseous defect and simplify the GBR and GTR procedures. The outcome of interim endodontic treatment on these 5 patients demonstrated that tooth extraction would have been a less predictable approach. The interim treatment changed the overall direction of the patients' dental care. When treated, these hopeless teeth served many preventive, biologic, and esthetic functions. The infections of the alveolar sockets were eliminated, the alveolar bone defects were repaired through normal bone regeneration, and sockets anatomies were maintained or restored. Furthermore, the patients were spared maxillary sinus surgery and the possible complications resulting from major GBR and GTR procedures. In summary, the interim treatment facilitated tooth extraction and immediate implant placement.
由于感染以及缺乏种植牙正确植入所需的结构,因此禁忌在患有根尖周和根尖周病变的感染牙新鲜拔牙窝中立即植入种植体。对于伴有病变的无保留价值牙齿的种植体替代,有4种方法:(1)拔牙并延迟植入种植体;(2)拔牙、清创、引导骨再生(GBR)、引导组织再生(GTR)并延迟植入种植体;(3)拔牙、拔牙窝内清创并立即植入种植体;或(4)拔牙、清创、GBR、GTR并同期植入种植体。拔除这类无保留价值的牙齿通常会导致大的骨和软组织缺损,难以修复。本文介绍一种替代方法:临时牙髓种植位点预备,定义为一种过渡性、手术性或非手术性牙髓治疗,以再生无保留价值牙齿的骨缺损并为种植体的正确植入预备位点。本文描述了用于治疗5例患者的3种不同的临时牙髓治疗方案,所有患者均患有严重感染且伴有大病变的无保留价值牙齿,并计划接受种植体替代治疗:第一种,临时非手术性牙髓治疗以恢复感染的无保留价值牙齿的正常解剖结构;第二种,对已进行过牙髓治疗的无保留价值牙齿进行临时手术牙髓治疗,以再生根尖骨以实现种植体的初期稳定性,从而避免上颌窦和其他关键解剖结构的累及;第三种,对已进行过牙髓治疗的无保留价值牙齿进行临时手术牙髓治疗,以限制骨缺损的大小并简化GBR和GTR操作。这5例患者的临时牙髓治疗结果表明,拔牙是一种可预测性较低的方法。临时治疗改变了患者牙科治疗的总体方向。经过治疗,这些无保留价值的牙齿发挥了许多预防、生物学和美学功能。牙槽窝感染得以消除,牙槽骨缺损通过正常骨再生得以修复,牙槽窝解剖结构得以维持或恢复。此外,患者避免了上颌窦手术以及大型GBR和GTR操作可能导致的并发症。总之,临时治疗有助于拔牙和立即植入种植体。