Department of Neurology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.
J Neurosci. 2010 Mar 10;30(10):3640-51. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4085-09.2010.
Spatial selective attention is widely considered to be right hemisphere dominant. Previous functional magnetic resonance imaging studies, however, have reported bilateral blood-oxygenation-level-dependent responses in dorsal frontoparietal regions during anticipatory shifts of attention to a location (Kastner et al., 1999; Corbetta et al., 2000; Hopfinger et al., 2000). Right-lateralized activity has mainly been reported in ventral frontoparietal regions for shifts of attention to an unattended target stimulus (Arrington et al., 2000; Corbetta et al., 2000). However, clear conclusions cannot be drawn from these studies because hemispheric asymmetries were not assessed using direct voxelwise comparisons of activity in left and right hemispheres. Here, we used this technique to measure hemispheric asymmetries during shifts of spatial attention evoked by a peripheral cue stimulus and during target detection at the cued location. Stimulus-driven shifts of spatial attention in both visual fields evoked right-hemisphere dominant activity in temporoparietal junction (TPJ). Target detection at the attended location produced a more widespread right hemisphere dominance in frontal, parietal, and temporal cortex, including the TPJ region asymmetrically activated during shifts of spatial attention. However, hemispheric asymmetries were not observed during either shifts of attention or target detection in the dorsal frontoparietal regions (anterior precuneus, medial intraparietal sulcus, frontal eye fields) that showed the most robust activations for shifts of attention. Therefore, right hemisphere dominance during stimulus-driven shifts of spatial attention and target detection reflects asymmetries in cortical regions that are largely distinct from the dorsal frontoparietal network involved in the control of selective attention.
空间选择性注意被广泛认为是右半球优势。然而,以前的功能磁共振成像研究报告称,在注意向目标位置(Kastner 等人,1999;Corbetta 等人,2000;Hopfinger 等人,2000)之前,背侧额顶枕区存在双侧血氧水平依赖性反应。对于注意向未注意目标刺激的转移,主要在额顶枕区的腹侧报告了右侧活动(Arrington 等人,2000;Corbetta 等人,2000)。然而,由于没有使用左半球和右半球活动的直接体素比较来评估半球不对称性,因此无法从这些研究中得出明确的结论。在这里,我们使用该技术来测量由外周提示刺激引起的空间注意转移期间以及在提示位置检测目标期间的半球不对称性。在两个视野中,由刺激驱动的空间注意转移在颞顶交界处(TPJ)引起右半球优势活动。在注意位置检测目标会在额、顶和颞叶皮层中产生更广泛的右侧优势,包括在空间注意转移期间不对称激活的 TPJ 区域。然而,在额顶枕区(前扣带回、内侧顶内沟、额眼区)的注意转移或目标检测过程中都没有观察到半球不对称性,这些区域对注意转移表现出最强的激活。因此,刺激驱动的空间注意转移和目标检测期间的右半球优势反映了与参与选择性注意控制的背侧额顶枕网络基本不同的皮质区域的不对称性。
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2025-1-29
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2024-12-19
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2024-4-8
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2024-6-26
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2025-7-23
Neuroimage Rep. 2021-10-16
J Neurosci. 2007-10-17