Peterson Madeline, Braga Rodrigo M, Floris Dorothea L, Nielsen Jared A
Department of Psychology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, United States.
Department of Neurology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2025 Jan 29;3. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00437. eCollection 2025.
The two hemispheres of the human brain are functionally asymmetric. At the network level, the language network exhibits left-hemisphere lateralization. While this asymmetry is widely replicated, the extent to which other functional networks demonstrate lateralization remains a subject of investigation. Additionally, it is unknown how the lateralization of one functional network may affect the lateralization of other networks within individuals. We quantified lateralization for each of 17 networks by computing the relative surface area on the left and right cerebral hemispheres. After examining the ecological, convergent, and external validity and test-retest reliability of this surface area-based measure of lateralization, we addressed two hypotheses across multiple datasets (Human Connectome Project = 553, Human Connectome Project-Development = 343, Natural Scenes Dataset = 8). First, we hypothesized that networks associated with language, visuospatial attention, and executive control would show the greatest lateralization. Second, we hypothesized that relationships between lateralized networks would follow a dependent relationship such that greater left lateralization of a network would be associated with greater right lateralization of a different network within individuals, and that this pattern would be systematic across individuals. A language network was among the three networks identified as being significantly left lateralized, and attention and executive control networks were among the five networks identified as being significantly right lateralized. Next, correlation matrices, an exploratory factor analysis, and confirmatory factor analyses were used to test the second hypothesis and examine the organization of lateralized networks. We found general support for a dependent relationship between highly left- and right-lateralized networks, meaning that across subjects, greater left lateralization of a given network (such as a language network) was linked to greater right lateralization of another network (such as a ventral attention/salience network) and vice versa. These results further our understanding of brain organization at the macro-scale network level in individuals, carrying specific relevance for neurodevelopmental conditions characterized by disruptions in lateralization such as autism and schizophrenia.
人类大脑的两个半球在功能上是不对称的。在网络层面,语言网络表现出左半球优势。虽然这种不对称性已被广泛复制,但其他功能网络表现出优势的程度仍是一个研究课题。此外,一个功能网络的优势如何影响个体内其他网络的优势尚不清楚。我们通过计算左右大脑半球的相对表面积,对17个网络中的每一个进行了优势量化。在检验了这种基于表面积的优势测量方法的生态效度、收敛效度、外部效度以及重测信度后,我们在多个数据集(人类连接体项目=553、人类连接体项目-发育=343、自然场景数据集=8)中探讨了两个假设。首先,我们假设与语言、视觉空间注意力和执行控制相关的网络将表现出最大程度的优势。其次,我们假设优势网络之间的关系将遵循一种依赖关系,即一个网络的左优势程度越高,个体内另一个不同网络的右优势程度就越高,并且这种模式在个体间是系统的。语言网络是被确定为显著左优势的三个网络之一,注意力和执行控制网络是被确定为显著右优势的五个网络之一。接下来,使用相关矩阵、探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析来检验第二个假设,并研究优势网络的组织。我们发现,高度左优势和右优势网络之间存在依赖关系,这一观点得到了普遍支持,也就是说,在所有受试者中,给定网络(如语言网络)的左优势程度越高,与另一个网络(如腹侧注意力/突显网络)的右优势程度越高相关,反之亦然。这些结果加深了我们对个体宏观尺度网络层面大脑组织的理解,对以优势破坏为特征的神经发育疾病(如自闭症和精神分裂症)具有特殊意义。