Department of Psychiatry, Geriatric Psychiatry Program, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2010 Apr;18(4):305-12. doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181c2941b.
Prior studies on the association of trait neuroticism and cognitive function in older adults have yielded mixed findings. The authors tested hypotheses that neuroticism is associated with measures of cognition and that depression moderates these relationships.
Cross-sectional observational study.
Primary care offices.
Primary care patients aged > or =65 years.
Trait neuroticism was assessed by the NEO-Five Factor Inventory. Major and minor depressions were determined by the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, and depressive symptom severity by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (Ham-D). Cognitive measures included the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Initiation-Perseveration subscale of the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale, and Trail-Making tests A and B.
In multiple regression analyses, neuroticism was associated with MMSE score independent of depression diagnosis (beta = -0.04, chi2 = 14.2, df = 1, p = 0.0002, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.07 to -0.02) and Ham-D score (beta = -0.04, chi2 = 8.97, df = 1, p = 0.003, 95% CI = -0.06 to -0.01). Interactions between neuroticism and depression diagnosis (chi2 = 7.21, df = 2, p = 0.03) and Ham-D scores (chi2 = 0.55, df = 1, p = 0.46) failed to lend strong support to the moderation hypothesis.
Neuroticism is associated with lower MMSE scores. Findings do not confirm a moderating role for depression but suggest that depression diagnosis may confer additional risk for poorer global cognitive function in patients with high neuroticism. Further study is necessary.
先前关于特质神经质与老年人认知功能关联的研究结果不一。作者检验了神经质与认知测量指标相关,以及抑郁对此类关系产生调节作用的假设。
横断面观察性研究。
初级保健诊室。
年龄≥65 岁的初级保健患者。
特质神经质采用 NEO 五因素量表评估。主要和次要抑郁采用精神障碍诊断与统计手册第四版定式临床访谈确定,抑郁症状严重程度采用汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(Ham-D)评估。认知测量包括简易精神状态检查(MMSE)、Mattis 痴呆评定量表的启动-持续测验分量表,以及连线测验 A 和 B。
在多元回归分析中,神经质与 MMSE 评分相关,与抑郁诊断无关(β=-0.04,χ²=14.2,df=1,p=0.0002,95%置信区间[CI]为-0.07 至-0.02),也与 Ham-D 评分相关(β=-0.04,χ²=8.97,df=1,p=0.003,95%CI 为-0.06 至-0.01)。神经质与抑郁诊断(χ²=7.21,df=2,p=0.03)和 Ham-D 评分(χ²=0.55,df=1,p=0.46)之间的交互作用并未有力支持调节作用假设。
神经质与 MMSE 评分较低相关。研究结果不能确认抑郁起调节作用,但提示在神经质较高的患者中,抑郁诊断可能会使整体认知功能恶化的风险增加。需要进一步研究。