Mental Health Research Unit, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland; Health Care and Social Services, City of Järvenpää, PL 41, 04401 Järvenpää, Finland.
Mental Health Research Unit, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland; Department of Psychiatry, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, P.O.Box 900, 00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland.
Eur Psychiatry. 2016 Mar;33:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2015.12.002. Epub 2016 Feb 6.
Response styles theory of depression postulates that rumination is a central factor in occurrence, severity and maintaining of depression. High neuroticism has been associated with tendency to ruminate. We investigated associations of response styles and neuroticism with severity and chronicity of depression in a primary care cohort study.
In the Vantaa Primary Care Depression Study, a stratified random sample of 1119 adult patients was screened for depression using the Prime-MD. Depressive and comorbid psychiatric disorders were diagnosed using SCID-I/P and SCID-II interviews. Of the 137 patients with depressive disorders, 82% completed the prospective five-year follow-up with a graphic life chart enabling evaluation of the longitudinal course of episodes. Neuroticism was measured with the Eysenck Personality Inventory (EPI-Q). Response styles were investigated at five years using the Response Styles Questionnaire (RSQ-43).
At five years, rumination correlated significantly with scores of Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (r=0.54), Beck Depression Inventory (r=0.61), Beck Anxiety Inventory (r=0.50), Beck Hopelessness Scale (r=0.51) and Neuroticism (r=0.58). Rumination correlated also with proportion of follow-up time spent depressed (r=0.38). In multivariate regression, high rumination was significantly predicted by current depressive symptoms and neuroticism, but not by anxiety symptoms or preceding duration of depressive episodes.
Among primary care patients with depression, rumination correlated with current severity of depressive symptoms, but the association with preceding episode duration remained uncertain. The association between neuroticism and rumination was strong. The findings are consistent with rumination as a state-related phenomenon, which is also strongly intertwined with traits predisposing to depression.
抑郁反应风格理论认为,反刍是抑郁发生、严重程度和维持的一个核心因素。高神经质与反刍倾向有关。我们在一项初级保健队列研究中调查了反应风格和神经质与抑郁严重程度和慢性的相关性。
在万塔初级保健抑郁研究中,采用 Prime-MD 对 1119 名成年患者进行了抑郁筛查,采用 SCID-I/P 和 SCID-II 访谈对抑郁和共病精神障碍进行了诊断。在 137 名患有抑郁障碍的患者中,82%完成了前瞻性五年随访,采用图形生活图表评估了发作的纵向过程。神经质采用艾森克人格问卷(EPI-Q)进行测量。反应风格采用反应风格问卷(RSQ-43)在五年时进行调查。
五年时,反刍与汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(r=0.54)、贝克抑郁量表(r=0.61)、贝克焦虑量表(r=0.50)、贝克绝望量表(r=0.51)和神经质(r=0.58)的评分显著相关。反刍与随访期间抑郁时间的比例也相关(r=0.38)。在多变量回归中,当前抑郁症状和神经质显著预测了高反刍,而焦虑症状或先前抑郁发作持续时间则不能预测。
在初级保健中患有抑郁的患者中,反刍与当前抑郁症状的严重程度相关,但与先前发作持续时间的关联仍不确定。神经质与反刍之间的关联很强。这些发现与反刍作为一种与状态相关的现象一致,它与导致抑郁的特质也紧密交织在一起。