Suppr超能文献

对姑息治疗患者进行定性研究:应用哈米克的研究伦理轮

Conducting qualitative research with palliative care patients: applying Hammick's research ethics wheel.

作者信息

Whiting Lisa S, Vickers Peter S

机构信息

University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK.

出版信息

Int J Palliat Nurs. 2010 Feb;16(2):58, 60-2, 64-6, 68. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2010.16.2.46751.

Abstract

This paper discusses the particular ethical issues that are present when attempting to undertake research involving patients accessing palliative care for cancer. It focuses on the use of Hammick's research ethics wheel (REW) in relation to a research study undertaken by the authors. Applying the REW enabled the authors to identify and incorporate the ethical issues and dilemmas inherent within such a study at a practical level. Ethical reasons for undertaking research with such vulnerable participants are explained and justified with reference to the REW. Ethical considerations are crucial to any research study involving human participants, but particularly so when dealing with participants who are as vulnerable as those in a palliative care setting. The use of the REW enabled the authors to feel confident that all such concerns had been identified before data collection began.

摘要

本文讨论了在试图开展涉及接受癌症姑息治疗患者的研究时所存在的特定伦理问题。它着重探讨了哈米克研究伦理轮(REW)在作者所进行的一项研究中的应用。运用研究伦理轮使作者能够在实际层面识别并纳入此类研究中固有的伦理问题和困境。参考研究伦理轮对与这类易受伤害参与者开展研究的伦理原因进行了解释和论证。伦理考量对于任何涉及人类参与者的研究都至关重要,尤其是在与处于姑息治疗环境中如此易受伤害的参与者打交道时。研究伦理轮的使用使作者确信在数据收集开始之前已识别出所有此类问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验