Whiting Lisa S, Vickers Peter S
University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK.
Int J Palliat Nurs. 2010 Feb;16(2):58, 60-2, 64-6, 68. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2010.16.2.46751.
This paper discusses the particular ethical issues that are present when attempting to undertake research involving patients accessing palliative care for cancer. It focuses on the use of Hammick's research ethics wheel (REW) in relation to a research study undertaken by the authors. Applying the REW enabled the authors to identify and incorporate the ethical issues and dilemmas inherent within such a study at a practical level. Ethical reasons for undertaking research with such vulnerable participants are explained and justified with reference to the REW. Ethical considerations are crucial to any research study involving human participants, but particularly so when dealing with participants who are as vulnerable as those in a palliative care setting. The use of the REW enabled the authors to feel confident that all such concerns had been identified before data collection began.
本文讨论了在试图开展涉及接受癌症姑息治疗患者的研究时所存在的特定伦理问题。它着重探讨了哈米克研究伦理轮(REW)在作者所进行的一项研究中的应用。运用研究伦理轮使作者能够在实际层面识别并纳入此类研究中固有的伦理问题和困境。参考研究伦理轮对与这类易受伤害参与者开展研究的伦理原因进行了解释和论证。伦理考量对于任何涉及人类参与者的研究都至关重要,尤其是在与处于姑息治疗环境中如此易受伤害的参与者打交道时。研究伦理轮的使用使作者确信在数据收集开始之前已识别出所有此类问题。