• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

定性研究中研究者与参与者关系的伦理问题。

Ethical issues in the qualitative researcher--participant relationship.

作者信息

Eide Phyllis, Kahn David

机构信息

Washington State University Intercollegiate College of Nursing, Spokane, WA 99205, USA.

出版信息

Nurs Ethics. 2008 Mar;15(2):199-207. doi: 10.1177/0969733007086018.

DOI:10.1177/0969733007086018
PMID:18272610
Abstract

Qualitative research poses ethical issues and challenges unique to the study of human beings. In developing the interpersonal relationship that is critical to qualitative research, investigator and participant engage in a dialogic process that often evokes stories and memories that are remembered and reconstituted in ways that otherwise would not occur. Ethical issues are raised when this relationship not only provides qualitative research data, but also leads to some degree of therapeutic interaction for the participant. The purpose of this article is to examine some of the controversies inherent in the researcher's dilemma when this occurs, set within the context of a nursing caring theory (Swanson), and the International Council of Nurses Code of ethics for nurses, which provides guidance on global nursing practice.

摘要

定性研究带来了人类研究特有的伦理问题和挑战。在建立对定性研究至关重要的人际关系时,研究者和参与者会参与到一个对话过程中,这个过程常常唤起以其他方式不会出现的方式被记住和重构的故事和记忆。当这种关系不仅提供定性研究数据,还在一定程度上导致参与者产生治疗性互动时,就会引发伦理问题。本文的目的是在护理关怀理论(斯旺森)以及为全球护理实践提供指导的国际护士理事会护士职业道德准则的背景下,审视这种情况发生时研究者困境中固有的一些争议。

相似文献

1
Ethical issues in the qualitative researcher--participant relationship.定性研究中研究者与参与者关系的伦理问题。
Nurs Ethics. 2008 Mar;15(2):199-207. doi: 10.1177/0969733007086018.
2
The adolescent research participant: strategies for productive and ethical interviewing.青少年研究参与者:进行富有成效和符合伦理的访谈的策略。
J Pediatr Nurs. 2009 Dec;24(6):448-57. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2008.07.009. Epub 2009 May 14.
3
An embodied response: ethics and the nurse researcher.具身回应:伦理与护士研究者。
Nurs Ethics. 2011 Jan;18(1):112-21. doi: 10.1177/0969733010385531.
4
Qualitative interviewing: encountering ethical issues and challenges.定性访谈:遭遇伦理问题与挑战。
Nurse Res. 2006;13(4):19-29. doi: 10.7748/nr2006.07.13.4.19.c5987.
5
Navigating uncharted water: research ethics and emotional engagement in human inquiry.探索未知领域:人类研究中的研究伦理与情感投入。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2006 Aug;13(4):423-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2006.00999.x.
6
A relational ethical dialogue with research ethics committees.与研究伦理委员会进行的关系性伦理对话。
Nurs Ethics. 2008 Mar;15(2):234-42. doi: 10.1177/0969733007086021.
7
Ethical challenges in qualitative research: examples from practice.定性研究中的伦理挑战:实践案例
Nurse Res. 2010;18(1):15-25. doi: 10.7748/nr2010.10.18.1.15.c8044.
8
Exploring the ethical issues of the research interview in the cancer context.探讨癌症背景下研究访谈中的伦理问题。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2006 Feb;10(1):39-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2005.04.002. Epub 2005 Jul 1.
9
Practitioner to researcher: reflections on the journey.从从业者到研究者:对这段历程的反思
Nurse Res. 2007;14(4):18-26. doi: 10.7748/nr2007.07.14.4.27.c6041.
10
The interview in qualitative research.定性研究中的访谈
Urol Nurs. 2005 Apr;25(2):124-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Making "inclusion" more than a buzzword: A critical interpretive synthesis of literature about recruiting seldom-heard groups in health research.让“纳入”不止是个流行语:关于在健康研究中招募罕有群体的文献的批判性解释性综述
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 12;20(6):e0318466. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318466. eCollection 2025.
2
The use of Arts-Based Research in Chronic Pain: A Scoping Review.基于艺术的研究在慢性疼痛中的应用:一项范围综述。
Can J Pain. 2024 May 8;8(1):2352876. doi: 10.1080/24740527.2024.2352876. eCollection 2024.
3
Lone parenthood in the COVID-19 context: Israeli single gay fathers' perspective.
新冠疫情背景下的单亲家庭:以色列男同性恋单身父亲的视角
Child Fam Soc Work. 2022 Apr 5. doi: 10.1111/cfs.12921.
4
Attending to Methodological Challenges in Qualitative Research to Foster Participation of Individuals with Chronic Critical Illness and Communication Impairments.关注定性研究中的方法学挑战,以促进患有慢性危重病和沟通障碍的个体的参与。
Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2021 Apr 19;8:23333936211000044. doi: 10.1177/23333936211000044. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
5
What do they get out of it? Considering a partnership model in health service research.他们从中得到了什么?考虑在卫生服务研究中采用伙伴关系模式。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2021 Apr 8;22:e14. doi: 10.1017/S1463423621000141.
6
Understanding the Meaning of Lived Experience "Maternal Near Miss": A Qualitative Study Protocol.理解“孕产妇险些死亡”的生活经历的意义:一项定性研究方案
J Caring Sci. 2021 Mar 1;10(1):43-48. doi: 10.34172/jcs.2021.008. eCollection 2021 Mar.
7
Considerations and recommendations for conducting qualitative research interviews with palliative and end-of-life care patients in the home setting: a consensus paper.关于在家中对姑息治疗和临终关怀患者进行定性研究访谈的考量与建议:一份共识文件。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2019 Mar;9(1):e14. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2015-000892. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
8
Ethical challenges of researchers in qualitative studies: the necessity to develop a specific guideline.质性研究中研究者面临的伦理挑战:制定特定指南的必要性。
J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2014 Aug 4;7:14. eCollection 2014.
9
Perceptions of audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (ACASI) among women in an HIV-positive prevention program.艾滋病毒阳性预防项目中女性对音频计算机辅助自我访谈(ACASI)的看法。
PLoS One. 2010 Feb 10;5(2):e9149. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009149.