Sivell Stephanie, Prout Hayley, Hopewell-Kelly Noreen, Baillie Jessica, Byrne Anthony, Edwards Michelle, Harrop Emily, Noble Simon, Sampson Catherine, Nelson Annmarie
Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Centre, Institute of Cancer and Genetics, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, Wales, UK.
School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK.
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2019 Mar;9(1):e14. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2015-000892. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
To present and discuss the views of researchers at an academic palliative care research centre on research encounters with terminally ill patients in the home setting and to generate a list of recommendations for qualitative researchers working in palliative and end-of-life care.
Eight researchers took part in a consensus meeting to discuss their experiences of undertaking qualitative interviews. The researchers were of varying backgrounds and all reported having experience in interviewing terminally ill patients, and all but one had experience of interviewing patients in their home environment.
The main areas discussed by researchers included: whether participation in end-of-life research unintentionally becomes a therapeutic experience or an ethical concern; power relationships between terminally ill patients and researchers; researcher reflexivity and reciprocity; researchers' training needs. Qualitative methods can complement the home environment; however, it can raise ethical and practical challenges, which can be more acute in the case of research undertaken with palliative and patients at the end-of-life.
The ethical and practical challenges researchers face in this context has the potential to place both participant and researcher at risk for their physical and psychological well-being. We present a set of recommendations for researchers to consider prior to embarking on qualitative research in this context and advocate researchers in this field carefully consider the issues presented on a study-by-study basis.
介绍并讨论一家学术性姑息治疗研究中心的研究人员对于在家庭环境中与晚期患者进行研究接触的看法,并为从事姑息治疗和临终关怀的定性研究人员生成一份建议清单。
八位研究人员参加了一次共识会议,讨论他们进行定性访谈的经历。这些研究人员背景各异,均报告有对晚期患者进行访谈的经验,除一人外,其他人都有在患者家中进行访谈的经验。
研究人员讨论的主要领域包括:参与临终研究是否会无意中成为一种治疗体验或引发伦理问题;晚期患者与研究人员之间的权力关系;研究人员的反思性和互惠性;研究人员的培训需求。定性方法可以补充家庭环境;然而,它可能会引发伦理和实际挑战,对于在姑息治疗和临终患者中开展的研究而言,这些挑战可能更为严峻。
研究人员在这种情况下面临的伦理和实际挑战有可能使参与者和研究人员的身心健康都面临风险。我们为研究人员在着手进行此类定性研究之前提供了一系列建议,并倡导该领域的研究人员在逐个研究的基础上仔细考虑所提出的问题。