Mercer University College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Atlanta, Georgia 30341, USA.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2009 Dec 17;73(8):145. doi: 10.5688/aj7308145.
To compare the acceptance rates of written versus verbal pharmacotherapy recommendations made by pharmacy students on an ambulatory care advanced pharmacy practice experience (APPE).
Fourth-year pharmacy students made written and verbal pharmacotherapy recommendations to resident physicians in an internal medicine clinic at an urban, teaching hospital over a 10-month period. The types of recommendations and outcomes of the interventions were recorded using a data collection form to determine differences in acceptance rates for written versus verbal recommendations. The recommendation types and corresponding acceptance rates were also compared.
Of 542 pharmacotherapy recommendations made by 14 APPE students during the 10-month study period, 65.1% were written and 34.9% were verbal. Of the 189 verbal recommendations, 97.9% were accepted, compared with 83.6% of written recommendations (p < 0.0001). The most frequent types of recommendations and overall rates of acceptance were dosage change (87.0%), laboratory monitoring (85.8%), and medication initiation based on evidence-based medicine guidelines (79.3%).
Verbal pharmacotherapy recommendations made by pharmacy students were accepted by resident physicians at a significantly higher rate than written recommendations in an outpatient internal medicine clinic.
比较在门诊医疗高级实践经验(APPE)中,由药学专业学生提出的书面与口头药物治疗建议的接受率。
在为期 10 个月的时间里,四年级药学专业学生在一家城市教学医院的内科诊所向住院医师提出了书面和口头药物治疗建议。使用数据收集表记录建议的类型和干预的结果,以确定书面和口头建议的接受率差异。还比较了建议类型和相应的接受率。
在 10 个月的研究期间,14 名 APPE 学生共提出了 542 项药物治疗建议,其中 65.1%为书面建议,34.9%为口头建议。在 189 项口头建议中,97.9%被接受,而书面建议的接受率为 83.6%(p<0.0001)。最常见的建议类型和总体接受率为剂量调整(87.0%)、实验室监测(85.8%)和根据循证医学指南启动药物治疗(79.3%)。
在门诊内科诊所,药学专业学生提出的口头药物治疗建议被住院医师接受的比例显著高于书面建议。