• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

可以将港端口导管冲洗间隔延长至四个月。

Interval between port catheter flushing can be extended to four months.

机构信息

Department of Gynecology, Medical Faculty of Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.

出版信息

Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2010;70(2):91-4. doi: 10.1159/000294919. Epub 2010 Mar 11.

DOI:10.1159/000294919
PMID:20224280
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Little is known about proper interval periods between the flushings of totally implantable access ports after completion of chemotherapy. Manufacturer guidelines recommend flushing catheters every 4 weeks.

METHODS

This retrospective study examined whether flushing less than every 4 weeks conferred any benefit.

RESULTS

349 totally implanted access ports were divided into four groups based on the different durations of the intervals between flushings. Sixteen (4.6%) complications were observed in the study population.

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate that extending the flushing interval to up to 4 months remains medically safe and drastically reduces the costs.

摘要

背景

完成化疗后,完全植入式输液港冲洗之间的适当间隔时间知之甚少。制造商指南建议每 4 周冲洗导管一次。

方法

本回顾性研究旨在探讨冲洗间隔时间少于 4 周是否有益。

结果

根据冲洗间隔时间的不同,349 个完全植入式输液港分为四组。研究人群中观察到 16 例(4.6%)并发症。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,将冲洗间隔时间延长至 4 个月仍然是安全的,并且可以大大降低成本。

相似文献

1
Interval between port catheter flushing can be extended to four months.可以将港端口导管冲洗间隔延长至四个月。
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2010;70(2):91-4. doi: 10.1159/000294919. Epub 2010 Mar 11.
2
A peripherally implanted permanent central venous access device.一种外周植入式永久性中心静脉通路装置。
Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Dec;78(6):1138-42.
3
Editorial regarding use of modified femoral vein approach as method for implanting a totally implantable access port in patients with synchronous bilateral mastectomies (Chen et al.).关于采用改良股静脉入路作为双侧同步乳房切除术患者植入完全植入式接入端口的方法的社论(陈等人)
J Surg Oncol. 2008 Sep 1;98(3):147. doi: 10.1002/jso.21071.
4
Long-term experience with a totally implanted catheter system in gynecologic oncologic patients.完全植入式导管系统在妇科肿瘤患者中的长期应用经验。
J Am Coll Surg. 1994 Feb;178(2):164-6.
5
Totally implantable venous access system in longterm chemotherapy.长期化疗中的完全植入式静脉通路系统
Int Surg. 1985 Jul-Sep;70(3):251-2.
6
Prolonged interval in prophylactic heparin flushing for maintenance of subcutaneous implanted port care in patients with cancer.癌症患者皮下植入式端口护理中预防性肝素冲洗间隔时间延长对维持其护理的影响
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2009 Mar;18(2):191-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2008.00973.x.
7
Clinical application of totally implantable venous access ports for patients with breast cancer.全植入式静脉输液港在乳腺癌患者中的临床应用
Asian J Surg. 2020 Sep;43(9):944-945. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2020.05.023. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
8
Do central venous catheters have advantages over arteriovenous fistulas or grafts?中心静脉导管比动静脉内瘘或移植物有优势吗?
J Nephrol. 2006 May-Jun;19(3):265-79.
9
Guidewire assisted cephalic vein cutdown for insertion of totally implantable access ports.导丝辅助头静脉切开术用于植入完全植入式接入端口
J Surg Oncol. 2007 Feb 1;95(2):156-7. doi: 10.1002/jso.20584.
10
Trigger arrhythmia to confirm the position of totally implantable access ports (TIAP).诱发心律失常以确认完全植入式接入端口(TIAP)的位置。
J Surg Oncol. 2007 Oct 1;96(5):436-7. doi: 10.1002/jso.20771.

引用本文的文献

1
Correlation between increased flushing intervals and malfunction and infectious complications in fully implantable catheters during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间完全植入式导管冲洗间隔时间增加与故障及感染并发症之间的相关性。
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2024 Dec 9;22:eAO0736. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2024AO0736. eCollection 2024.
2
Is it feasible to prolong the flushing interval for totally implantable venous access devices (TIVADs)? A systematic review and meta-analysis.延长完全植入式静脉通路装置(TIVADs)的冲洗间隔是否可行?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2025 Jan;30(1):40-50. doi: 10.1007/s10147-024-02665-2. Epub 2024 Nov 27.
3
Quality of life in women with breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy: comparison between PICC and PICC-port.
乳腺癌新辅助化疗患者生活质量的比较:PICC 与 PICC 置管港
Breast Cancer. 2024 Sep;31(5):945-954. doi: 10.1007/s12282-024-01608-z. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
4
Safety and feasibility assessment of extending the flushing interval in totally implantable venous access port flushing during the non-treatment stage for patients with breast cancer.乳腺癌患者非治疗阶段完全植入式静脉输液港冲管间隔延长的安全性与可行性评估
Front Oncol. 2022 Dec 2;12:1021488. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1021488. eCollection 2022.
5
Evidence on port-locking with heparin versus saline in patients with cancer not receiving chemotherapy: A randomized clinical trial.未接受化疗的癌症患者中肝素与生理盐水封管的证据:一项随机临床试验。
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2022 May 21;9(9):100085. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2022.100085. eCollection 2022 Sep.
6
Is There a Relationship Between Frequency of Port-Care Maintenance and Related Complications in Patients With Cancer?癌症患者的端口维护频率与相关并发症之间是否存在关系?
JCO Oncol Pract. 2022 Sep;18(9):e1438-e1446. doi: 10.1200/OP.22.00060. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
7
Current port maintenance strategies are insufficient: View based on actual presentations of implanted ports.当前的端口维护策略并不充分:基于植入端口的实际表现的观点。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Nov;98(44):e17757. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017757.