Department A of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tunisian Maternity and Neonatology Center, Rabta, Tunis, Tunisia.
Contraception. 2010 Apr;81(4):323-7. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2009.12.002. Epub 2010 Jan 15.
Medical abortion regimens based on the use of either misoprostol alone or in association with mifepristone have shown high efficacy and excellent safety profile in early pregnancy abortion. However, no clear recommendation is available for late first-trimester termination of pregnancy.
A prospective randomized controlled trial included 122 women seeking medical abortion at 9 to 12 weeks of gestation. Seventy-three patients were given a fixed protocol of 200 mg of mifepristone followed 48 h later by 400 mcg oral misoprostol (Group 1). The second group of 49 patients was administered 800-mcg intravaginal single-dose misoprostol (Group 2). This study sought to compare safety, efficacy and acceptability of these two nonsurgical abortion regimens.
Fifty-nine (80.8%) women in Group 1 had complete abortion vs. 38 (77.4%) women in Group 2 (p=.66). Abdominal pain was observed significantly more often in Group 2 (35/49 (71.4%) vs. 32/73 (43.8%) in Group 1, p<.0001. Medical abortion was equally acceptable among the two groups [37/49 (75.5%) and 55/73 (75.7%), p=.89].
For late first-trimester termination, a single 800-mcg vaginal dose of misoprostol seems to be as effective as the mifepristone+misoprostol regimen, with acceptable side effects.
单独使用米非司酮或联合米索前列醇的药物流产方案在早孕流产中显示出了高效性和极好的安全性。然而,对于孕 9-12 周的晚期流产,尚无明确的推荐方案。
一项前瞻性随机对照试验纳入了 122 名在孕 9-12 周时寻求药物流产的女性。73 名患者接受了 200mg 米非司酮的固定方案,48 小时后给予 400μg 口服米索前列醇(第 1 组)。第 2 组 49 名患者给予 800μg 单次阴道内米索前列醇(第 2 组)。本研究旨在比较这两种非手术流产方案的安全性、疗效和可接受性。
第 1 组 59 名(80.8%)女性完全流产,第 2 组 38 名(77.4%)(p=.66)。第 2 组中腹痛明显更为常见(35/49 [71.4%] vs. 32/73 [43.8%],p<.0001)。两组之间药物流产的可接受性相当[37/49(75.5%)和 55/73(75.7%),p=.89]。
对于孕 9-12 周的晚期流产,单次 800μg 阴道内米索前列醇剂量似乎与米非司酮+米索前列醇方案同样有效,且副作用可接受。