Moosavi Horieh, Moazzami Saieds Mostafa, Loh Shaghayegh, Salari Soheil
Dental Research Center of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Iran.
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2010 Mar 1;11(2):009-16.
Core buildup composite resins with prefabricated posts are commonly used to restore endodontically treated teeth. This study compared the sealing ability of Core Max II and Panavia F2.0 cement with total-etch and self-etch adhesive systems.
Sixty recently extracted human second premolar teeth were chosen and their crowns were cut 3 mm above the CEJ. After preparing proximal boxes (4+/-1 mm buccolingually and 3 mm occlusogingivally dimensions) and finishing root canal therapy, the teeth were randomly divided into four groups (n=15): groups 1 and 2, Core Max II without and with total-etch adhesive; groups 3 and 4, Clearfil photocore composite, A2 shade, and Panavia F2.0 cement without and with self-etch adhesive respectively. The Dentatus posts (# 2 Long) were used in canals approximately 8 mm depth. According to manufacturer guidelines, pins were cemented and cores were restored. After keeping the specimens for 24 hours at 37 degrees C and 100% humidity, they were thermally cycled for 500 cycles, sealed with nail varnish except 1 mm beyond the margins of restoration, and then immersed in a 0.5% fuschin basic for 24 hours. Samples were embedded in clear epoxy resin, sectioned mesiodistally, and observed at 20x magnification. The microleakage was assessed under stereomicroscope and the results were recorded in percentage of dye penetration to the whole path from the cavosurface margin of the proximal boxes to the end of the post. Analysis of variance and the Tukey test were used to evaluate the data (p=0.05).
Groups 1 and 4 had the highest and the lowest values of microleakage respectively. Microleakage of Panavia F2.0 cement was lower than for Core Max II and for both cements using adhesive made the microleakage smaller than without it (p<0.05).
Application of adhesive using Core Max II cement and Panavia F2.0 cement is strongly recommended to decrease microleakage. Self-etch adhesive performed better than total-etch adhesive.
With regards to microleakage, the self-etching primer displayed better sealing than that obtained with the total-etching, two-step dental adhesive.
带预制桩的核桩复合树脂常用于修复经根管治疗的牙齿。本研究比较了Core Max II和Panavia F2.0粘结剂在全酸蚀和自酸蚀粘结系统中的封闭能力。
选取60颗近期拔除的人类第二前磨牙,在牙冠釉牙骨质界上方3mm处截冠。制备近中盒(颊舌径4±1mm,咬合龈向3mm)并完成根管治疗后,将牙齿随机分为四组(n = 15):第1组和第2组,分别使用不含全酸蚀粘结剂和含全酸蚀粘结剂的Core Max II;第3组和第4组,分别使用不含自酸蚀粘结剂和含自酸蚀粘结剂的Clearfil光固化核复合树脂(A2色)和Panavia F2.0粘结剂。在根管内约8mm深度处使用Dentatus桩(#2长)。按照制造商指南,粘结桩并修复核。将标本在37℃、100%湿度下保存24小时后,进行500次热循环,除修复边缘外1mm处用指甲油密封,然后浸入0.5%碱性品红中24小时。将样本包埋在透明环氧树脂中,近远中向切片,在20倍放大倍数下观察。在体视显微镜下评估微渗漏情况,结果以染料从近中盒洞缘至桩末端的全路径渗透百分比记录。采用方差分析和Tukey检验评估数据(p = 0.05)。
第1组和第4组的微渗漏值分别最高和最低。Panavia F2.0粘结剂的微渗漏低于Core Max II,且两种粘结剂使用粘结剂时的微渗漏均小于未使用时(p < 0.05)。
强烈建议使用Core Max II粘结剂和Panavia F2.0粘结剂时应用粘结剂以减少微渗漏。自酸蚀粘结剂的效果优于全酸蚀粘结剂。
就微渗漏而言,自酸蚀底漆的封闭效果优于全酸蚀两步法牙科粘结剂。