Centre for Educational Measurement and Applied Cognitive Science, University of Luxembourg, Walferdange, Luxembourg.
Psychol Assess. 2010 Mar;22(1):199-202. doi: 10.1037/a0017661.
The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) assesses executive and frontal lobe function and can be administered manually or by computer. Despite the widespread application of the 2 versions, the psychometric equivalence of their scores has rarely been evaluated and only a limited set of criteria has been considered. The present experimental study (N = 100 healthy adults) therefore examined the psychometric equivalence of 4 scores (i.e., Total Correct, Percentage of Errors, Perseverative Errors, and Failure-to-Maintain-Set) obtained on the 2 versions of the WCST in terms of 4 key criteria identified within the framework of classical test theory. The results showed considerable differences in variances, small to modest parallel-forms reliability coefficients, and small to modest temporal stability coefficients. Taken together, our results suggest that scores on the manual version and the computer version of the WCST show incomplete psychometric equivalence.
威斯康星卡片分类测验(WCST)评估执行和额叶功能,可以手动或通过计算机进行测试。尽管这两种版本被广泛应用,但它们的评分的心理测量等效性很少被评估,并且只考虑了有限的标准。本实验研究(N=100 名健康成年人)因此根据经典测试理论框架内确定的 4 个关键标准,检验了两种版本 WCST 获得的 4 个分数(即总正确、错误百分比、持续错误和保持设置失败)的心理测量等效性。结果表明,在方差、小到中等程度的平行形式信度系数和小到中等程度的时间稳定性系数方面存在很大差异。总之,我们的结果表明,手动版和计算机版 WCST 的分数显示出不完全的心理测量等效性。