Department of Psychiatry, Division of Health Services Research, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Slot 755, Little Rock, Arkansas 72205, USA.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2010 Mar;71(2):258-67. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2010.71.258.
Substance use is associated with poor mental health, but little is known regarding how use of multiple substances is associated with mental health, particularly longitudinally, in community studies. This article examines this issue in a large (N = 710), natural-history study of rural stimulant (cocaine and/or methamphetamine) users in three states.
Respondent-driven sampling recruited recent (past-30-day) stimulant users in three counties each in Arkansas, Kentucky, and Ohio. Participants were interviewed every 6 months for 3 years. Mental health was measured by the Brief Symptom Inventory, and prior 6 months' substance use was measured for 17 possible substances. Data analysis used generalized estimating equations for longitudinal data with the Global Severity Index of the Brief Symptom Inventory as the dependent variable at each interview and substance use as predictor variables measured by number of substances used in the past 6 months and, separately, the 17 individual substances, adjusting for use of substance-use treatment, demographics, and recruitment site.
On average, both Global Severity Index score and use of many substances declined over the course of study. Global Severity Index score was significantly associated with (a) greater number of substances used in the past 6 months (p < .0001) and (b) use of crack cocaine, methamphetamine, and nonprescription use of prescription painkillers and tranquilizers.
Multiple and specific substances appear to incrementally increase psychological distress. Users of cocaine and methamphetamine are present in rural areas; these associations with poor psychological health raise concerns regarding availability of local treatment services for individuals with mental-health problems, as well as substance abuse.
物质使用与心理健康不良有关,但对于多种物质的使用如何与心理健康相关,特别是在社区研究中,纵向研究的情况知之甚少。本文在三个州的农村兴奋剂(可卡因和/或甲基苯丙胺)使用者的大型(N=710)自然史研究中探讨了这个问题。
通过受访者驱动抽样,在阿肯色州、肯塔基州和俄亥俄州的每个县各招募最近(过去 30 天)使用兴奋剂的参与者。参与者每 6 个月接受一次为期 3 年的访谈。使用 Brief Symptom Inventory 测量心理健康,使用过去 6 个月内使用的 17 种可能物质测量物质使用情况。使用广义估计方程对纵向数据进行分析,Brief Symptom Inventory 的总体严重程度指数作为每个访谈的因变量,物质使用情况作为预测变量,通过过去 6 个月使用的物质数量和单独的 17 种物质来衡量,调整物质使用治疗、人口统计学和招募地点的使用情况。
平均而言,总体严重程度指数得分和多种物质的使用在研究过程中均呈下降趋势。总体严重程度指数得分与(a)过去 6 个月使用的物质数量较多(p<.0001)和(b)使用可卡因、甲基苯丙胺以及非处方使用处方止痛药和镇静剂显著相关。
多种特定物质似乎会逐渐增加心理困扰。可卡因和甲基苯丙胺的使用者出现在农村地区;这些与心理健康不良的关联引起了人们对当地提供心理健康问题患者和药物滥用者治疗服务的可用性的关注。