Division of Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2010 Mar;95(2):F80-4. doi: 10.1136/adc.2009.167338.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of remifentanil as a premedication in neonates undergoing elective endotracheal intubation.
A double-blind randomised controlled trial.
Tertiary care neonatal intensive care unit.
Haemodynamically stable term and preterm neonates requiring elective endotracheal intubation.
Infants in the intervention arm received remifentanil (3 microg/kg) and normal saline placebo. The control group received fentanyl (2 microg/kg) and succinylcholine (2 mg/kg). Both groups also received atropine (20 microg/kg) as part of the premedication regime.
The primary outcome was time to successful intubation. Secondary outcomes included time to return of spontaneous respirations, oxygen saturation, heart rate and blood pressure changes during the procedure, adverse events and a survey of intubation conditions.
A total of 15 infants were randomised to each group. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. The median time to successful intubation was not statistically different (247 s in the remifentanil group vs 156 s in the fentanyl group, p=0.88). The intubation conditions were rated more favourably with fentanyl by the intubators. Although not statistically significant, chest wall rigidity was observed more commonly with remifentanil.
Although remifentanil is comparable to fentanyl and succinylcholine in attenuating adverse physiologic responses during neonatal intubation, muscle rigidity is a concern at doses of 3 microg/kg. Further trials are required to evaluate ideal dosing regimens and combinations of agents for use with remifentanil in neonates.
评估瑞芬太尼作为择期气管插管新生儿的预用药的疗效和安全性。
双盲随机对照试验。
三级保健新生儿重症监护病房。
需要择期气管插管的血流动力学稳定的足月和早产儿。
干预组患儿接受瑞芬太尼(3μg/kg)和生理盐水安慰剂。对照组患儿接受芬太尼(2μg/kg)和琥珀胆碱(2mg/kg)。两组患儿还接受了作为预用药方案一部分的阿托品(20μg/kg)。
主要结局是成功插管的时间。次要结局包括自主呼吸恢复时间、氧饱和度、心率和血压变化、不良事件以及插管条件的调查。
共有 15 名婴儿被随机分配到两组。两组患儿的基线特征相似。成功插管的中位时间无统计学差异(瑞芬太尼组为 247 秒,芬太尼组为 156 秒,p=0.88)。插管条件评分显示芬太尼组的评价更有利。尽管无统计学意义,但瑞芬太尼组更常观察到胸壁僵硬。
虽然瑞芬太尼在减轻新生儿插管期间的不良生理反应方面与芬太尼和琥珀胆碱相当,但在 3μg/kg 剂量下,肌肉僵硬是一个问题。需要进一步的试验来评估瑞芬太尼在新生儿中的理想剂量方案和联合用药组合。