Division of Infectious Diseases, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010 May;54(5):1864-71. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00911-09. Epub 2010 Mar 15.
Increasing rates of invasive candidiasis caused by non-albicans Candida species have been reported worldwide. Particular concerns have been raised for C. parapsilosis because of reduced in vitro susceptibility to echinocandins. We identified 212 patients with invasive candidiasis due to non-albicans Candida species (>or=5 cases per species) in 5 clinical trials of caspofungin monotherapy from the pharmaceutical sponsor's (Merck and Co., Inc.) database: 71 cases were caused by C. parapsilosis, 65 by C. tropicalis, 54 by C. glabrata, 10 by C. krusei, 9 by C. guilliermondii, and 5 by C. lusitaniae. One hundred sixty-seven cases caused by C. albicans were also identified. Efficacy was assessed at the end of caspofungin therapy. Success (favorable overall response) required favorable clinical and microbiological responses. The mean APACHE II scores were 16.5 in the non-albicans group and 15.7 in the C. albicans group. Neutropenia at study entry was more common in the non-albicans group (12%) than in the C. albicans group (5%). The median duration of caspofungin therapy was 14 days in both groups. The success rates were 77% in both groups and at least 70% for each non-albicans species: 74% for C. parapsilosis, 71% for C. tropicalis, 85% for C. glabrata, 70% for C. krusei, 89% for C. guilliermondii, and 100% for C. lusitaniae. The times to negative blood culture were similar for the various species. The overall mortality rates were 26% in the non-albicans group and 29% in the C. albicans group. Drug-related serious adverse events and discontinuations due to caspofungin toxicity were uncommon. Although the sample sizes were limited, caspofungin demonstrated favorable efficacy and safety profiles in the treatment of invasive candidiasis caused by the following non-albicans Candida species: C. parapsilosis, C. tropicalis, C. glabrata, C. krusei, C. guilliermondii, and C. lusitaniae.
全世界范围内,非白色念珠菌念珠菌引起的侵袭性念珠菌病的发生率呈上升趋势。由于对棘白菌素类药物的体外敏感性降低,近平滑念珠菌尤其受到关注。我们从制药赞助商(默克公司)的数据库中识别出 5 项卡泊芬净单药治疗侵袭性念珠菌病的临床试验中有 212 例非白色念珠菌念珠菌感染患者(每种念珠菌>或=5 例):71 例由近平滑念珠菌引起,65 例由热带念珠菌引起,54 例由光滑念珠菌引起,10 例由克柔念珠菌引起,9 例由季也蒙念珠菌引起,5 例由葡萄牙念珠菌引起。还确定了 167 例由白色念珠菌引起的病例。在卡泊芬净治疗结束时评估疗效。成功(总体有利的临床和微生物学反应)需要有利的临床和微生物学反应。非白色念珠菌组的平均 APACHE II 评分为 16.5,白色念珠菌组为 15.7。研究入组时中性粒细胞减少症在非白色念珠菌组更为常见(12%),而白色念珠菌组为 5%。两组卡泊芬净治疗的中位时间均为 14 天。两组的成功率均为 77%,每种非白色念珠菌的成功率均至少为 70%:近平滑念珠菌 74%,热带念珠菌 71%,光滑念珠菌 85%,克柔念珠菌 70%,季也蒙念珠菌 89%,葡萄牙念珠菌 100%。不同种属的血培养转为阴性的时间相似。非白色念珠菌组的总死亡率为 26%,白色念珠菌组为 29%。药物相关严重不良事件和因卡泊芬净毒性而停药的情况并不常见。尽管样本量有限,但卡泊芬净在治疗下列非白色念珠菌念珠菌引起的侵袭性念珠菌病方面显示出良好的疗效和安全性:近平滑念珠菌、热带念珠菌、光滑念珠菌、克柔念珠菌、季也蒙念珠菌和葡萄牙念珠菌。