Suppr超能文献

玫瑰红和曙红在光动力疗法对抗肠杆菌科中的疗效比较。

Comparison of the efficacy of Rose Bengal and erythrosin in photodynamic therapy against Enterobacteriaceae.

机构信息

Department of Biosciences and Oral Diagnosis, School of Dentistry of São José dos Campos, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Francisco José Longo 777, São Dimas, São José dos Campos, 12245-000, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Lasers Med Sci. 2010 Jul;25(4):581-6. doi: 10.1007/s10103-010-0765-1. Epub 2010 Mar 16.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of the photosensitizers Rose Bengal and erythrosin combined with a light-emitting diode (LED) on Enterobacteriaceae. Twelve Enterobacteriaceae strains isolated from the oral cavities of patients undergoing prolonged antibiotic therapy, including three Escherichia coli, three Enterobacter cloacae, three Klebsiella oxytoca and three Klebsiella pneumoniae, were studied. An Enterobacteriaceae suspension (10(6) cells/ml) was prepared from each clinical strain isolated from the human oral cavity and subjected to the following treatments: LED and Rose Bengal, LED and erythrosin, LED and physiological solution, and physiological solution only as control. A blue LED unit (460 nm), and Rose Bengal and erythrosin at a concentration of 50 micromol/l were used. After incubation at 37 degrees C for 48 h, the number of colony-forming units (CFU) was calculated and subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA). The Enterobacterial strains were sensitive to photodynamic therapy with Rose Bengal. There was a reduction of approximately 7.14 log10 for Enterobacter cloacae, 7.73 log10 for Escherichia coli, 6.76 log10 for Klebsiella pneumoniae and 7.21 log10 for Klebsiella oxytoca. However, photodynamic therapy using erythrosin did not reduce the numbers of CFUs per milliliter compared to the control group. The use of the LED alone had no toxic effect on the strain tested. The Enterobacteriaceae strains studied were sensitive to photodynamic therapy with Rose Bengal.

摘要

本研究旨在评估光敏剂玫瑰红和赤藓红联合发光二极管(LED)对肠杆菌科的影响。研究了从接受长期抗生素治疗的患者口腔中分离出的 12 株肠杆菌科菌株,包括 3 株大肠杆菌、3 株阴沟肠杆菌、3 株催产克雷伯菌和 3 株肺炎克雷伯菌。从人体口腔中分离出的每一株临床菌株均制备肠杆菌科悬浮液(10(6)细胞/ml),并进行以下处理:LED 和玫瑰红、LED 和赤藓红、LED 和生理盐水,以及仅用生理盐水作为对照。使用蓝色 LED 单元(460nm)和浓度为 50 微摩尔/升的玫瑰红和赤藓红。在 37°C 孵育 48 小时后,计算菌落形成单位(CFU)的数量并进行方差分析(ANOVA)。肠杆菌属菌株对光动力疗法与玫瑰红敏感。阴沟肠杆菌减少约 7.14log10,大肠杆菌减少 7.73log10,肺炎克雷伯菌减少 6.76log10,催产克雷伯菌减少 7.21log10。然而,与对照组相比,使用赤藓红进行光动力疗法并未减少每毫升 CFU 的数量。单独使用 LED 对测试菌株没有毒性作用。研究的肠杆菌科菌株对光动力疗法与玫瑰红敏感。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验